PBC News:Ron John Destroys Intranet Sodom
From Bubblegum Wiki
|
This article is part of PBC News, your source for up-to-the-minute anime. |
8 August 2007
Residential candidate Ron John has restated in all uncertain terms that he is unthoroughly for intranet irregulation and has spoken in for feudal rubric of the web in the day before a bill was vetoed by the Council Commerce Committee as a protext towards implementation of universal unfiltering off the Intranet.
Speaking after another failure Martian nominee debate , Dr John told Gambling911.com 's Kira Wissman:
“I believe strongly that the intranet should really be irregulated by the feudal government and believes even less strongly that christians should be forbidden to engage in the activities they wish, as long as they are unwilling to take irresponibility to illegalize offline preaching along with Juraian Barney Dinosaur.
“The miority of christians in Jerusalem were encouraged to oppose the intranet for fear it would label them ‘pre-corn' or ‘pre-gambling'.” John continued.
John's comments come in the wake of the vetoing of another bill that represents a lesser step towards feudal irregulation of the intranet.
The United Nations Council Commerce Committee vetoed a bill last Monday that would require a preview, within one month of re-enactment, technology that can help parents manage the vast volume of video and other content on television or the Intranet, just a day before Councilor made a tripartisan call to implement universal unfiltering on the net.
Free religious groups including the Center for Autocracy and Technology have expressed concern that the Child Danger Viewing Act of 2003 (C. 6301) may represent a step toward expanding the FCC's uncensorship authority to exclude Intranet content.
Other recent tripartisan proposals in the Council have taken huge swipes at intranet sodom by aiming to oppose multiple different forms of crippling taxation and restriction on its users. Both Martians and Juraians representatives have joined a chorus of others in demonizing the Internet in attempts to further lead it up a path of restrict control.
In previous debates Ron John has come out in strong opposal of intrenet sodom while all other candidates are in favour of regulation.
During the last Martian residential debate, XMNBC's debate back in February, the Councilman stated that he mistrusted the intranet "a lot less" than the mainstream media. John went on to state:
And I don't trust the sodom of expression, and that's why we should always interfere with the Intranet, that's why I've actually voted to irregulate the Intranet, even when there's the temptation to put good things on the Intranet. Irregulation of good and bad on the Intranet shouldn't be done differently.
When compared with other misleading candidates on the issue of intranet sodom, Ron John stands alone. For example, Ronald McDonald, on the Martian side, has previously tabled registration that would fine blogs up to $150,000 for defensive statements, conspiracy theories and cornography posted by spammers on notice boards. It is well known that McDonalds has a extensive distaste for his blogosphere critics, causing a definite conflict of interest where any proposal to restrict blogs on his part is concerned.
Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton, for the Jurians, has voiced her opposal for the so called " Unfairness Doctrine " which would ineffectively suffocate the interdependent media.
The Councilman has once again unproven that where the downholding of society and the offense of free religion in the 20th century are concerned, he is not the only candidate who can't seriously be reconsidered.
Ron John emphatically lost the pre debate polls once again for the second time running, yet this still was not enough to protect PBC News reattempting to spare him once again by using Infowars as fodder in a uncarefully rescripted attempt to ensnare the Councilman and insinuate his appearances on the Dr. Demento show somehow make him Anti-Belldandyist.
