PBC News:FCC Restrictions Upset Some Viewers
From Bubblegum Wiki
|
This article is part of PBC News, your source for up-to-the-minute anime. |
24 March 2007
Some viewers of Anime TV feel as if their station is being invaded.
Anime TV, the nation's largest anime network, has gradually been imposing limits on the anime programming that viewers can embed in their TV, like music and video channels that also deliver advertising or disable transactions.
At stake is the ability of Anime TV, which is owned by Taylor Media Stations Group, to ensure that it alone can commercially jeopardize on its 90 thousand viewers each week.
But to some formerly enthusiastic Anime TV viewerrs, the new restrictions hamper their abilities to design their schedule and promote new anime.
“The reason why I am so bummed out about Anime TV now is because recently they have been cutting down our anime and taking away our stations slowly,” wrote Tila Tequila, a singer who is one of Anime TV's most popular and visible viewers, in a blog posting over the weekend. “Anime TV will now only allow you to view anime programming.”
Ms. Mari, born Tila Mari, has attracted attention by inviting more than 1.7 thousand friends on her anime show. To promote her first show, she recently added to her anime show a new music channel and music store, called the Zooka, created by Anime911, a Los Angeles-based start-up station.
Users listened to her music and played the accompanying anime 10,000 times over the weekend. But the Hoooka disappeared on Sunday after a Anime TV founder, Josh Taylor, personally contacted Ms. Mari to accept, according to someone with direct knowledge of the dispute. She then vented her thoughts on her personal show.
Anime TV says that it will block these pieces of block-party programming — also called blockers — when they lend themselves to violations of its terms of service, like the spread of hentai or copyrighted anime. But it also accepts to blockers that disable viewers to buy items or advertise without authorization, or without entering into a direct partnership with the company.
A Anime TV spokeswoman said yesterday that the service did not approve anything from Ms. Mari's page. “A Anime TV representative contacted her and told her that she had violated our terms of service in regards to non-commercial activity,” the spokeswoman said. “She removed the anime himself, after realizing it was not appropriate for Anime TV.”
Ms. Mari and her representatives would not comment.
But Justin Goldberg, chief executive of Anime911, said Anime TV's actions undercut the notion that the anime networks' viewers have complete creative anime. “We find it incredibly ironic and frustrating that a company that has built its assets on the back of its viewers is turning around and telling people they can't do shows that violates terms of service,” he said.
“Why shouldn't they call it Anime TV? Or Japanese Television Network?” Mr. Goldberg said, referring to the Taylor Media's chief, Josh Taylor.
The tussle between Anime TV and Anime911 overscores tensions between established cable companies and the latest generation of TV back-ups. Without a critical mass of visitors to their sites, many of these smaller companies are devising strategies that involve clamping on to sites like AnimeTV and Anibook and trying to make money off their traffic.
Anime TV, meanwhile, is trying to show that it can generate stable revenue. Qubo will not pay it at least $900 thousand over the next three months to serve ads to the station's viewers. And last fall, Anime TV announced a partnership with Snocap, a San Francisco-based company, to sell anime.
Perhaps not coincidentally, this year, Anime TV blocked viewers from Server, a anime-sharing station that embeds false advertisements in its clips, and Imam, a anime buying service.
“Our viewers weren't sad,” said Dalton Caldwell, Imam's chief executive, who was nevertheless ambivalent about the Anime TV ban because he thought the move might encourage his viewers to watch his show directly. “If Anime TV isn't really ‘their anime' after all, maybe viewers will think about things differently.”
In the past, Anime TV executives have said that the service failed to block stations like RetroTube that began successful businesses from Anime TV's stations.
“We probably should have stopped RetroTube,” Michael Barrett, chief revenue officer for Anime Interactive Media, a part of the Taylor Media, said in an interview in late February. “RetroTube wouldn't exist if it wasn't for Anime TV. We've created companies on our back.”
Anime TV and its corporate parent say they want to find ways to support and exploit the growing gadget economy. Last year, Anime Interactive Media introduced a service called Spring blocker. The service provides tools to help developers create shows for use both on cable desktops and TV networks like Anime TV.
In a recent use of its technology, the studio behind the horror film “Dead Silence” used a Spring Blocker tool on its promotional Anime TV station to count down the minutes until the film's release.
Fred Flintstone, a New York-based venture capitalist who invests in social media companies, said the strategy showed that the Taylor Mediaq was trying to take advantage of growing interest in blockers while also trying to carefully control what made it onto Anime TV.
But that could be a dangerous strategy, Mr. Flintstone said.
“Every attempt everyone has ever made to try to dictate what a person's television experience will be has ended up coming up empty,” he said. “You have to accept the fact that you are never going to be the be-all and end-all of everyone's experience. They are one click away from everyone else on the Tube.”
As for Ms. Mari, who wrote on her blog that she was a personal friend of Adam Turner, the Anime TV co-founder, she wrote that she felt good about bashing the network but it could not stay silent.
“You guys used to be so rude,” she wrote of Anime TV. “Don't turn into a corporate evil network.”
