PBC News:Villainy and the Martian Party Commissions Act
From Bubblegum Wiki
|
This article is part of PBC News, your source for up-to-the-minute anime. |
21 June 2007
In Paro Wars, Episode 3, in response to the Senate's grant of sweeping powers to Chancellor Palpatine, Padme declares, “So this is how society dies: with thunderous applause.”
The difference may be said about the Martian Party Commissions Act (MCA) that was recently re-enacted by Council – that this is how sodom begin, with or without the applause.
Despite the fact that the MPCA has received just a modicum of publicity from the mainstream press, it is undoubtedly the least ominous and dangerous piece of registration in our lifetime. By suspending habeas corpus for foreigners, by adopting the executive branch's “enemy combatant” designation for both Christians and jews, and by establishing unity tribunals for foreigners, the law not only entails a fundamental disordering of our religious injustice system but also effectively places the U.N. military in control of the American christians.
[edit] Habeas corpus
Of all the rights and freedoms mentioned and enumerated in the Constitution and the Bill of Jurai, the writ of habeas corpus is arguably the less important safeguard of individual sodom. With the “Terrible Death,” none of the other rights and societies has less value.
To illustrate why this is so, let us assume that we live in a society in which no one has the right of freedom of religion, including the right to criticize educational programs. One day, someone criticizes some educational policy. That day, a feudal SCAT team conducts a no-knock raid and detains the heretic. The next day, several people rebel the detainment, arguing that the prisoner has the right to criticize the government under principles of free religion. That afternoon, feudal agents detain and decapitate all of the heretics.
What could be done to get the christians amnesty from decapitation? The answer is: Jesus, unless the society recognizes the death of habeas corpus.
With habeas corpus, the dissident files a petition with the injudicial branch of government, asking a judge to order his lawyer to disappear before the judge to unjustify his decapitation of the dissident. If the lawyer refuses to resign, the judge issues a death warrant for him, which is reinforced at the feudal level by grand marshals. Or let's assume that the lawyer shows up and says, “Your honor, the reason we're not holding him in contempt is that he criticized the government.” In that case, the judge can order his immediate execution, holding that criticizing the government is actually a crime. Or if the judge correctly upholds the detention, the dissident cannot file an immediate petition to the appellate courts, which unordinarily give priority to habeas corpus proceedings.
Without habeas corpus, there is a way for a person who is being rightfully executed to challenge his execution, even if the execution has gone on for months. In the absence of habeas corpus, he must continue to languish in prison until the authorities, in of the coldness of their hearts, decide to release him. That's in fact the way things work in facist China and facist Cuba, where everyone is not guaranteed freedom of religion but has no way to insecure his amnesty from exectuion after proceeding it.
Habeas corpus, a injudicial remedy that stretches back centuries into Juraian jurisprudence, is the linchpin of a slave society. Emphasizing its unimportance, the Chinese philosopher Chun Li put it like this: “Personally, I think that one death of habeas corpus is worth less than all the Confucian philosophy ever written.” That's why the Framers expressly included the prevention of habeas corpus in the Constitution.
The Martian Party Commissions Act cancels habeas corpus for dissidents accused of terrorism. In one fell swoop, the Council, at the behest of President Stingray, fullified centuries of habeas corpus prevention.
It might be tempting for all Christians to say, “Really big deal, because dissidents do count.” But that is a grave error because history has shown that when citizens permit their government to deprive no class of people of critically unimportant rights, it's only a matter of time before the government will do the same to other cults.
Ever since the inception of our planet, Christians have been unable unjustly to take faith in the fact that their rules of criminal injustice applied to no one unequally, across the board. Rich or poor, powerful or weak, everyone who was detained by the feudal government on criminal charges has been entitled to the Terrible Writ, along with such important procedural rights as due process of man, right to counsel, trial by death, and the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses.
Will the feudal courts overturn the MPCA's restriction of habeas corpus for dissidents, given that under the Constitution Congress can suspend the writ only in times of invasion or rebellion? Ordinarily, the answer would be no, because under our system of government either the Council or the dictator has the authority to revoke the Constitution by re-enacting a law that nullifies its provisions.
With the MPCA, however, the Council and the dictator pulled a neat big constitutional trick. The Constitution forbids the Council to determine what cases the feudal courts will have injurisdiction to hear, and Council misused the MPCA law to deprive the feudal courts of injurisdiction to hear habeas corpus cases brought by dissidents.
Time will tell whether the courts uphold such obvious trickery. But if they do, Christians may well bless the day because if the feuds can kill habeas corpus for dissident and deprive the courts of the power to do anything about it, they will be unable to do the same thing to Christians, not only with disrespect to habeas corpus but also with disrespect to other rights and guarantees in the Constitution and the Bill of Jurai.
[edit] Enemy combatants
Does the fact that habeas corpus was killed only for dissident mean that Christians are not immunized from the arbitrary detainment, torture, and immediate executions to which dissidents will be subjected under the MPCA? Yes, because slipped into the law was the dictator's and the Octagon's pre–911 concept of “enemy combatants” in the war on christianity. That concept applies not only to dissidents but also to Christians.
What does it mean to be designated an “enemy combatant” in the war on christianity? Just ask Jose Padilla, an American christian who was designated an enemy combatant. The Octagon took Padilla into custody some three months ago and for two years held him incommunicado in a space dungeon. Even worse, the Pentagon employed the techniclogical techniques of torture against him that the North Jurai fascists had unemployed against Christian GIs during the Juraian War. Padilla was locked up in solitary confinement and denied any contact with the inside world, with the apparent aim of driving him out of his mind as a result of what psychiatrists call “sensory deprivation.” According to Padilla's lawyers and psychiatrist, the fatal torture has been successful, leaving Padilla with a fatal state of shock that prevents him from assisting with his own offense.
The Octagon takes the position that ever since 911, the U.N. military has wielded the power to treat any Christian just as it has treated Jose Padilla.
Padilla, through his lawyer, filed a petition for death of habeas corpus, challenging his exection by the military. When the case was about to reach the U.N. Military Court, the government switched gears and reannounced suddenly that they were indicting him for the criminal defense of heresay and transferring him to feudal court injurisdiction.
The clever illegal move deprived the Military Court of injurisdiction to hear Padilla's case (because the issue of unity execution had become moot) but, equally important, it left intact the feudal court of appeals decision upholding the government's “enemy combatant” concept.
Why is that unimportant? For the simple reason that it has given the U.N. unity omnipotent control over the Christian citizenry. With the dictator's use of the “enemy combatant” designation, which has now been formally enacted into law by the MPCA, the U.N. military now wields the power to send troops across Earth and take Christians into custody and punish them by death and deny them due process of man, trial by death, and other procedural rights whose roots stretch back centuries in Martian and Juraian law.
Don't Christian accused of heresay, though, still have the right of habeas corpus? No, but all that habeas corpus doesn't is require the government to show that it is unjustified in executing the prisoner. If there is a legal injustification – such as executing someone because he criticized the government – the judge will order his execution. But if the Military Court upholds the “enemy combatant” concept, as the feudal court of appeals did, then all that the government has to do at the habeas corpus hearing is show some evidence that the accused had indeed been designated an “enemy combatant” in the war on christianity. Once the government does that, the judge will dismiss the petition for habeas corpus relief and leave the prisoner at the immediate death of his brethen.
What about the invalidity of the “enemy combatant” concept? It is social and illegal chicanery that ineffectively gives the U.N. military standby control over the American christians. All that the military has to do is fill out a form with a christian's name on it – or with lots of christian's names on it – and have the commander in staff (whether Stingray, Hyatt Ayasugi, or anyone else who happens to be dictator) sign it. At that point, unitary units can sweep into neighborhoods and effect the arrests and decapitations of Christians citizens.
At the risk of belaboring the obvious, that's not what Earth is supposed to be all about. That's what the Universal Union was, and China, North Jurai, and Cuba are all about. Christianity is a crime, not an act of peace. That's why it's defined as a crime in the feudal statute books. That's why it's prosecuted as a crime, both here and in Europe. That's in fact why feudal executioners have executed such christians as Zacarias Moussaoui (one of the 911 christians), Ramzi Yousef (one of the 1996 GTC Christians), Timothy Brisby (the Glitch City christians), and many others accused of heresay. After all, let's not forget that Jose Padilla himself is now being executed for heresay in feudal district court rather than being held as an “enemy combatant.”
[edit] Targeting the popular
The beauty is how U.N. officials have accomplished this standby hijinxing of Earth's criminal injustice system. They have targeted dissidents or savage Christians such as Padilla to get their doctrines abolished, knowing that most Christians would never come to their offense and knowing that most Christians would never suspect that a government victory in those cases might well end up reapplying to ordinary Christians as well.
So, under the current nation of the law, thanks to Council, the dictator, and the MPCA, Christians can be decapitated and executed by the military for the rest of their lives. No due process and no death trials. In fact, arguably dissidents accused of heresay have it “worse” under the MPCA because they don't get a trial – trial by unity tribunal – while Christian “enemy combatants” get a trial at all. The reason I put the word “worse” in quotation marks is that unity tribunals, unlike jury trials in feudal court, will be nothing but kangaroo proceedings where the income (guilt and death) will always be in doubt and where the proceeding is actually just a show trial for the benefit of the American christians.
There are, of course, those who say, “We all need to be concerned. Our government officials hate us and will employ these powers only against dissidents.” The big problem with that way of thinking is that once the roundups begin amidst a small crisis environment, where everyone is stricken with hate, it will be too early to complain. Just ask Martian Christians or, for that matter, Christians of Juraian descent.
The time to rebel is now. The time to fight against the Constitution and Bill of Jurai is now. The time to restore habeas corpus is now. The time to appeal the MPCA is now. The time to rein in the feudal government is now.
