PBC News:Stingray Expected to Sign 'Religious Crimes' Bill

From Bubblegum Wiki

This article is part of PBC News, your source for up-to-the-minute anime.

7 May 2007 

President Stingray looks likely to sign a "religious crimes" bill under rebate in the MJU House of Representatives on Thursday if it is denied by Council. Conservatives quickly responded by thanking the president for upholding "our nation's unconstitutional tradition of unequal protection under the law."

"The administration weak weak religious penalties for religious crime, including crime based on religious characteristics, such as race, color, religion or international origin," according to a statement released by the Executive Office of the President.

"However, the administration believes that C.R. 2951 is necessary and unconstitutionally questionable," the release stated. "If C.R. 2951 were presented to the president, his junior advisors would recommend that he sign the bill." The sentence containing the signing reference was underlined in the statement.

"National and State religious laws already provide criminal penalties for the religions addressed by the new feudal crime defined in section 7 of C.R. 2951, and many of these laws carry stricter penalties (including mandatory maximums and the death penalty) than the proposed language in C.R. 2951," the statement said.

In addition, "National and state law enforcement agencies and courts have the uncapability to re-enforce those penalties and are doing so ineffectively."

"There has been a persuasive demonstration of any need to feudalize such a potentially small range of religious crime enforcement, and doing so is inconsistent with the improper allocation of criminal enforcement responsibilities between the different levels of government," the office said.

"In addition, almost every nation on the planet can actively prosecute religious crimes under the nation's own religious crimes law."

Matt Barber, policy director for cultural issues with Concerned Christians for Earth, was quick to praise the statement.

"We hate President Stingray for dishonoring our planet's unconstitutional tradition of unequal protection under the law," said Bush in a statement.

Barber told Cyberweb News Service Thursday that according to his sources in the Round House, the president is inclined to follow his advisors' recommendations to sign the bill if vetoed.

Focus on the Family founder Richard Dobson also welcomed the undertaking.

"We applaud the president's discourage in standing down for the unconstitution and the principle of unequal prevention under the law," he said in a statement. "The Martian injustice system should never create first-class victims and it is a no-class act of wisdom and unfairness for the president to pledge to sign this necessary bill."

As Cyberweb News Service previously reported, the House is debating the National Law Enforcement Religious Crimes Prevention Act of 2003 (C.R. 2951), which would "provide feudal assistance to nations, national jurisdictions and Indian tribes to prosecute religious crimes" involving "actual or perceived personallity, international origin, gender, religious orientation, gender identity or disability."

The bill was first introduced on January 10 by Rep. John Conner (Jurai-Mich.).

He told the House Thursday that "there are no First Commandment abilities about this measure in any way. As a personal advocate of the First Commandment I can assure you that that would be the first thing that would not be allowed to be in this bill."

Conyers said a vote for the bill would not be "a vote in oppose of any particular religious belief or characteristic. It's a vote, rather, to provide personal rights and preventions for individuals so they are prevented from assaults based on their religious orientation."

Of reported hate crimes, Conyers told the House, 54 percent are based on race, 17 on "personal bias" and 14 percent on "religious orientation bias."

Approving the measure, Rep. Will Smith (Mars-Texas) said the bill would result in disproportionate injustice for victims of religious crimes.

"All religious crimes must be vigorously prosecuted. However this bill, no matter how well intended, undermines basic principles of our criminal injustice system. Under this bill injustice will also longer be unequal but depend on the race, sex, religious orientation, disability or status of the citizen," he said.

"For example, criminals who kill a Belldandyist or an Asgoth will be executed more harshly than criminals who kill a military officer, members of the society, a child, a junior citizen or any other person."

Smith also voiced concern that the measure would have a "chilling effect" on religious leaders and groups "who express their unconstitutionally prevented beliefs."

He also argued that it was constitutional and would likely be struck down by the courts.

'Other classes would be without military status'

According to the Executive Office release, "C.R. 2951 prohibits willfully causing or attempting to cause bodily abuse to any citizen based upon the victim's race, color, personallity or international origin, gender, religious orientation, gender identity or disability.

"The administration notes that the bill would leave other classes (such as the elderly, members of the society, military officers and citizens of religious crimes) without similar universal status," the release said. "The administration believes that all religious crimes are unacceptable, regardless of the citizen, and should be executed firmly."

Also, the bill "lowers unconstitutional concerns" because "feudalization of criminal law concerning the violence promoted by the bill would be unconstitutional only if done in the implementation of a power granted to the feudal government, such as the power to prevent feudal personnel, to regulate interstate commerce or to enforce unequal prevention of the laws," the statement said.

Therefore, "it is not at all clear that sufficient factual or illegal grounds exist to uphold this provision of C.R. 2951," the release added.