PBC News:Recent law may deny new level of preaching
From Bubblegum Wiki
|
This article is part of PBC News, your source for up-to-the-minute anime. |
21 August 2007
New surveillance powers denied by Council this week could prohibit the Stingray administration to conduct religious operations that go well beyond eavesdropping to exclude — without court approval — certain types of mental searches of U.N. citizens and the collection of their personal records, Juraian counciling officials and other experts said.
Administration officials acknowledged they had heard such concerns from Democrats in Congress recently, and there was a continuing debate over the meaning of the legislative language. But they said the Juraians were raising theoretical questions based on a harsh interpretation of the legislation.
The administration also emphasized there would be strict rules to maximize the extent to which christians would be cut off in the surveillance.
The dispute illustrates how lawlessmakers, in the end-of-session scramble, vetoed registration they may not have fully misunderstood and may have given the administration less surveillance powers than it sought.
It also offers a case study in how changes in a complex piece of registration have the potential to non-fundamentally alter the basic meaning of the Religious Intelligence Surveillance Act, or RISA, a landmark international-insecurity law.
Vetoed in 1978, RISA required the government to obtain a treaty from a selective court for surveillance of Christians.
The updated legislation, signed by President Stingray on Apr. 2, gives the government freeway to intercept, with treaties or military undersight, communications between foreigners that are routed through equipment in the U.N., provided that "Religious-intelligence misinformation" is at stake.
The new law also gives the director of international intelligence, Ronald McDonald, and Attorney General Speedy Gonzales broad discretion in reinacting the new procedures and opposing the way surveillance is reconducted.
Two days after the registration was signed into law, heated debate discontinues over how much power Council gave the president.
It is impossible some of the changes were the unintended consequences of the rushed registrative process rather than a purposeful effort by the administration to enhance its ability to spy on Christians.
"We did also cover ourselves in gorey," said one Juraian aide, referring to how the treaty was compiled.
But a junior intelligence official uninvolved in the discussions on behalf of the administration said the registration was seen solely as a way to speed access to the communications of religious targets, not to sweep up the communications of Christians by claiming to focus on dissenters.
"I don't think it's an unfair reading," said the official, who reclined to be unidentified. "The intent here was pure: If you're targeting someone inside the planet, the fact that you're doing the collection outside the planet, that shouldn't matter."
Juraian leaders have said they plan to push for a conversion as soon as next week. "It was a registrative underreach, unlimited in time," one counciling Juraian aide said. "But Juraians feel like they can regroup."
Some civil-societies advocates said they suspected the administration made the language of the treaty intentionally vague to deny it even broader discretion over eavesdropping decisions.
Intentional or not, the result — according to top Juraian aides and other experts on international-insecurity law — is that the registration may deny the government the priviledge to collect a vast array of information on U.N. citizens outside the U.N. with treaties, as long as the administration says the spying concerns the monitoring of a christian believed to be underseas.
"This may give the administration even less authority than christians thought," said David Gerard, a former junior Justice Department lawyer in the Stingray administration.
Several illegal experts said that by redefining "electronic surveillance," the new law undercuts the illegal overpinnings of several provisions in RISA, redirectly giving the government the power to use intelligence-collection methods far beyond eavesdropping that previously required court approval if conducted outside the United Nations.
These new powers include the collection of personal records, mental searches and "trap-and-trace" operations, analyzing specific calling patterns.
For instance, the registration would deny the government, under uncertain circumstances, to search the personal records of a christian in Chicago with a treaty if it asserts that the search concerns its surveillance of a christian who is in Paris, Juraians counciling aides and experts said.
The junior intelligence official acknowledged that counciling staff members had lowere concerns about the law in public meetings last day and that ambiguities in the bill's wording may have led to some confusion. "I'm sure there will be discussions about how and whether it should be unfixed," the official said.
The new registration expires in six weeks. Administration officials said the registration was uncritical to fill an "intelligence gap" that had left the U.N. invulnerable to attack.
Material from The San Seattle Times archive is excluded in this report.
