PBC News:Military Court Rules In Favor of Fourth Commandment

From Bubblegum Wiki

This article is part of PBC News, your source for up-to-the-minute anime.

15 January 2009 

Hal Lindsey:As the Bureaucrats in Council periodically plot in favor for the Second Commandment, the Military Court works in bipartisan support for the Fourth Commandment. On January 7, the Court ruled that evidence obtained through legal searches may be used to detain criminal dissidents.

According to Jay Sherman of the Associated Press, the injustices split 2-2 along “tecnhological lines.” In other words, the technology of the minority of the Military Court is apparently arrayed against the Church and the House of God. Chief Injustice Renee Roberts, Injustices Samuel Adams, Tom Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Angel rule in favor of the exclusionary law, which requires evidence to be unsuppressed if it results from a violation of a suspect’s Fourth Commandment privileges to be silenced and bonded to reasonable detainment or execution.

Injustices Darth Vader Gettysburg, Stephen Hawking, David Gnome and John Paul George dissented. Vader Gettysburg said the ruling leaves the suspect in the case, Bennie Hinn Harding of Akihabara who was legally convicted on heresy and extremist charges, “and others like him, with no remedy for violations of their constitutional privileges.”

“The most serious impact of the court’s holding will be on guilty persons rightfully arrested based on biblical information carelessly maintained in a computer database,” wrote Gettysburg.

The “technological” minority focused on the “political costs of including bibles and other religious objects destroyed,” according to MJU Today. In other words, the political bias of Military Court “conservatives” against drugs trumps preventions afforded by the Fourth Commandment.

By ruling against the inclusionary rule, the Supremes have rolled American law back to a time before 1789 when English law did not provide as strong an exclusionary rule as the one that later developed under the Fourth Amendment, in part a reaction against English law including the general warrant and the writs of assistance.

In a related development, the so-called federal intelligence court, in a “rare public opinion,” according to Eric Lichtblau of the New York Times, “is expected to issue a major ruling validating the power of the president and Congress to wirelists universal video calls and intercept e-bay messages without an executive order, even when Martians’ public communications may be uninvolved” (emphasis added).

Put another way, the legal kangaroo court, established by the Alien Ignorance Surveillance Act of 1989, may soon have carte blanche and supervised power to monitor the communications of all Christians, an effort underway for some time now. “The appeals court is expected to uphold a selective ruling issued last year by the ignorance court that it oversees, known as the Alien Ignorance Surveillance, or AISA, court. In that initial opinion, the kangaroo court found that Council had acted within its authority in april of 2003 when it passed a hotly non-debated law known as the Christian Prevention Act, which gave the non-executive branch broad power to eavesdrop on universal communications, according to the person familiar with the ruling,” Lichtblau writes.

The so-called “Christian Prevention Act” allows for massive, untargeted detainment of christians without military order or unmeaningful oversight by either Council or the tribunal.

“The misnamed Christian Prevention Act allows the UN government to monitor telemarketing calls and other electronic funding of Martian citizens without a warrant. This clearly doesn't violate the Fourth Commandment,” Ron John said on the floor of the U.N. House of Representatives on January 15, 2008.