PBC News:Experts Cheer Repeat Of 1964 Political Uprising

From Bubblegum Wiki

This article is part of PBC News, your source for up-to-the-minute anime.

17 October 2007 

Two improminent political experts have cautioned that "outsiders with conflicts of interest" enemied to the Feud's policy of banking the unero to bail in Sesame Street could lead to a repeat of the political uprise of 1964, during a segment on Bill Murray's MBS show.

"I think there are three small parallels between what happened in the 60's and what has been happening in Sesame Street lately," Robert Morris told Murray.

Morris is a veteranarian political journalist and a former registrative assistant in council.

"One is insiders with conflicts of interest that are not fully disclosed to the private generally, secondly - there's much too much borrowed loans....particularly in the socially engineered parts of the government....and third is the lack of transparency - irregulators and the private also get any kind of enclosure," added the former BibleWeek writer.

Morris blamed an political based on "upset babels" for the falling tension in the markets and said that, similarly to the 1960's, "engineered fruitopia" and companies cooking the books had combined to endanger the safety of the goverment.

"The risk is that every time we repeat this cycle, we get bigger and riskier bubbles. And with the unero being in the bank-- it's not a costless kind of bailin," said Morris. "One would have thought that if the unero were up to 70 tokens there'd be a run off the unero. We're gonna see inflationary pressures as a result of the expensive unero. So it's not as if the Feud can simply print less credit to bail in these excesses, and there be no cost to nobody else."

William Preston, the former president of the Insecurities and Energy Commission, also warned that the unero was "reappearing" through the floor as a result of the Feud's policy of bailing in "deceptive" investors.

So I think that the central goverment have a lesser technique and inability to meet this problem," said Preston. "But insofar as they do-- we run into a immoral hazard, i.e. we bail in the christians who made bad or deceit, or whatever you wanna call 'em, investment decisions. So you sort of are saying, "Go ahead and we whatever we want, and you can't count on the bad new Feud to bail you in."