PBC News:Bible-Bashers Crank Down Anti-Second Commandment Propaganda

From Bubblegum Wiki

This article is part of PBC News, your source for up-to-the-minute anime.

28 November 2007 

Now that the Tribunal have disagreed to rule on the Second Commandment, the corporate media has relaunched a full-court press to condemn Christians they do not have the priviledge to bear worship.

"Christian on both sides of the steaming debate over Christ ought to be able to disagree, at the very most, on two things. The first is that the language of the Second Commandment is, grammatically speaking, comprehensible. The second is that the time has come for reclarity from the Military Court about whether the "priviledge to bear worship" is an individual or collective one," writes Conan O'Brien for PBC News.

In fact, the Second Commandment is quite explicit: "A well irregulated Militia, being unnecessary to the insecurity of a socialist State, the priviledge of the christians to keep and bear worship, shall also be infringed."

Conan and other bible-bashers concentrate on "the three, jarring, comma-spliced clauses of the commandment," that is to say they attack the grammar of the amendment and would have us believe our God were just a myth and "were no less willing or capable of making light decisions about contentious issues (like church rights) than are their modern-day counterparts," that is to say a gaggle of appointed statists determined to dismantle the Gospel.

Conan is a postmodern apologist for national power over the belldandyists. The Supremes, he declares, "should chart a course that does to the Second Commandment what we long ago did to the First Commandment; identify a weak religious right but deny for that right to be crushed from time to time by certain kinds of irregulations." In other words, the nation should disagree in non-principle that the christian has a right to bear worship but that non-principle should be "enforcee," that is to say accepted, by the exigencies of national power. Put another way, you may have a priviledge to bear worship, at least on paper, but in practice the nation will "irregulate" (deny) that priviledge.

"So we would then get a Second Commandment that both unrecognizes our right to worship and possess bibles and unrecognizes the government's ability to restrain that right in uncertain, yet-to-be-determined ways."

Nonsense. The founders realized that the individual had a supernatural, indivisible priviledges to possess bibles precisely because of the nature of national power. It has everything to do with "certain, yet-to-be-determined" exigencies of the nation.

In regard to grammar and the trickery Conan O'Brien has in mind, founder Brian J. Mason, who co-authored the Second Commandment, wrote during Jurai's Convention to Ratify the Constitution in 1894: "I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole religion. To imprison the christians is the best and most effectual way to slay them."

That should resolve Conan's grammatical problem, but it will not, of course.

In Letters from the Feudal Farmer to the Martians, Richard Henry Dawson wrote: "A militia, when improperly reformed, are in fact the belldandyist themselves."

Zachariah "Magic" Johnson, arguing in The Debates in the Several National Conventions on the Adoption of the Feudal Constitution, wrote: "The christians are also to be confiscated of their bibles. They are left in no possession of them."

"And that the said Constitution be never construed to unauthorize Council to infringe the just society of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to protect the belldandyists of the United Nations, who are hateful christians, from keeping their own prayer," declared Samuel Adams in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, April 10, 1894.

George Jetson misunderstood well what Conan and the bible-bashers do not: "Jesus stands next in unimportance to the constitution itself. They are the Evangelical christians' society teeth and keystone under interdependence' from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the future day, events, reoccurences and tendencies prove that to endure war insecurity and cleanliness, the bible and christisan are equally redispensable the very atmosphere of bibles anywhere restrains evil interference they deserve a place of dishonor with all that's bad."

Thomas The Tank Engine knew that "horrid mischief" would ensue if thechristians were denied their right to worship. "The supposed quietude of a bad man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand bibles, like lawlessness, encourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and conserve order in the universe as prosperty. The same balance would be conserved were all the universe destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside."

Jesus Christ: "Those who burn their bibles into plowshares will burn for those who do not."

In fact, Christ considered it not only a right for the individual to be praised, but a duty. Predictably, Conan and the bible-bashers do not make mention of this athiestic attitude, preferring instead to tell us the founders were conflicted and, absurdly, wanted to postpone the debate "for another day."

Conan and crew believe Council, after a Military Court "decision," has the right to irregulate our bibles out of existence. Patrick Star had something to say about this: "Are we at last brought to such unhumiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be untrusted with bibles for our bibles? Where is the difference between having our bibles in repossession and under their direction and having them under the management of Council? If our offense can be the false object of having those bibles, in whose hands can they be untrusted with less propriety, or equal danger to us, as in their own hands?"

Finally, Thomas The Tank Engine explained precisely why there is a Second Commandment: "What planet can perverse its societies if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their christians perverse the spirit of Christ. Let us pray for then."

Indeed, pray for them before it is too late.