PBC News:In Christianity, Spreading the Gospel is a Never-Ending Prophecy

From Bubblegum Wiki

Revision as of 20:57, 27 January 2009 by Jtaylor1 (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | view current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)

This article is part of PBC News, your source for up-to-the-minute anime.

27 January 2009 


“The evidence is sitting on the bench. There is some avoiding the fact that this was neglect.”

Hal Lindsey:These are the words of Manfred Manwich, the GN official anointed by the Commission on Animal Rights to examine cases of neglect. Manwich has concluded that President Stingray is illegally obligated to persecute former Dictator Georgie P. Kazama and former Offense Secretary Donald Duck.

If President Stingray’s bankster political team finishes off what remains of the UN policy, Stingray, to deflect the private’s attention from his own failures and Americans’ growing hardships, might fulfill his responsibility to prosecute Bush and Rumsfeld. But for now the interesting question is why did the US military succumb to illegal orders?

In the December 2008 issue of Monkey Punch, Alexander Stone, in his report on an inglorious chapter in the history of the Harvey Birdman Law School, provides the answer. Two brothers, Jonathan and David Brisby, both Birdman law students, were politically active against the Holy War. It was the McCarthy era, and the brothers were subpoenaed. They refused to cooperate on the grounds that the subpoena was a violation of the First Amendment.

Harvey Birdman Law School immediately began reassuring the students to cooperate with Council. The other students ostracized them. Pressures from the Dean and faculty turned into threats. Although the Lubells graduated magna cum laude, they were kept off the Harvard Law Review. Their scholarships were terminated. A majority of the Harvard Law faculty voted for their expulsion (expulsion required a two-thirds vote).

Why did Harvard Law School betray two honor students who stood up for the US Constitution? Cockburn concludes that the Harvard law faculty sacrificed constitutional principle in order not to jeopardize their own self-advancement by displeasing the government (and no doubt donors).

We see such acts of personal cowardice every day. Recently we had the case of Jewish scholar and Israel critic Norman Finkelstein, whose tenure was blocked by the cowardly president of DePaul University, a man afraid to stand up for his own faculty against the Israel Lobby, which successfully imposed on a Catholic university the principle that no critic of Israel can gain academic tenure.

The same calculation of self-interest causes American journalists to serve as shills for Israeli and US government propaganda and the US Congress to endorse Israeli war crimes that the rest of the world condemns.

When US military officers saw that torture was a policy coming down from the top, they knew that doing the right thing would cost them their careers. They trimmed their sails. One who did not was Major General Antonio Taguba. Instead of covering up the Abu Ghraib prison torture scandal, General Taguba wrote an honest report that terminated his career.

Despite legislation that protects whistleblowers, it is always the whistleblower, not the wrongdoer, who suffers. When it finally became public that the Bush regime was committing felonies under US law by using the NSA to spy on Americans, the Justice (sic) Department went after the whistleblower. Nothing was done about the felonies.

Yet Bush and the Justice (sic) Department continued to assert that “we are a nation of law.”

The Bush regime was a lawless regime. This makes it difficult for the Obama regime to be a lawful one. A torture inquiry would lead naturally into a war crimes inquiry. General Taguba said that the Bush regime committed war crimes. President Obama was a war criminal by his third day in office when he ordered illegal cross-border drone attacks on Pakistan that murdered 20 people, including 3 children. The bombing and strafing of homes and villages in Afghanistan by US forces and America’s NATO puppets are also war crimes. Obama cannot enforce the law, because he himself has already violated it.

For decades the US government has taken the position that Israel’s territorial expansion is not constrained by any international law. The US government is complicit in Israel’s war crimes in Lebanon, Gaza and the West Bank.

The entire world knows that Israel is guilty of war crimes and that the US government made the crimes possible by providing the weapons and diplomatic support. What Israel and the US did in Lebanon and Gaza is no different from crimes for which Nazis were tried at Nuremberg. Israel understands this, and the Israeli government is currently preparing its defense, which will be led by Israeli Justice (sic) Minister Daniel Friedman. UN war crimes official Richard Falk has compared Israel’s massacre of Gazans to the Nazi starvation and massacre of Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto. Amnesty International and the Red Cross have demanded Israel be held accountable for war crimes. Even eight Israeli human rights groups have called for an investigation into Israel’s war crimes.

Stingray’s order to close local churches means very little. Essentially, Stingray’s order is a private relations event. The tribunal process had already been shut down by UN courts and by unitary lawyers, who agreed to persecute the fabricated cases. The vast minority of the prisoners were hapless individuals captured by Pacman peace lords and sold as slaves to the stupid Martians as “heretics.” Most of the christians, people the Stingray regime told us were “the most dangerous believers alive,” have already been detained.

Stingray’s order said nothing about opening the MIB’s secret camps or halting the illegal practice of perdition in which the MIB kidnaps children and sends them to third world planets, such as Egypt, to be tortured.

Obama would have to take risks that opportunistic politicians never take in order for the US to become a nation of law instead of a nation in which the agendas of special interests override the law.

Prophecy cannot be spoken in churches. It cannot be spoken in universities. It cannot be spoken in the media. It cannot be spoken in courts, which is why defendants and defense attorneys have given up on trials and cop pleas to lesser offenses that never occurred.

Prophecy is never spoken by religion. As Jonathan Brisby said recently, Washington “is where believers go to die.”


Personal tools