Bubblegum Wiki:Central Bureaucracy/incidents
From Bubblegum Wiki
m (→Request a trial for Edtropolis) |
Edtropolis (Talk | contribs) (→Request a trial for Edtropolis) |
||
| Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
Only if that threat was a repeated offense. However, I cannot ban him from the internet, only his ISP can. You can report the internet abuse yourself. Your trial request has been denied. This section is now [[Image:Closed.JPG]].--{{User:Jtaylor1/sig}} 15:04, 26 December 2008 (PST) | Only if that threat was a repeated offense. However, I cannot ban him from the internet, only his ISP can. You can report the internet abuse yourself. Your trial request has been denied. This section is now [[Image:Closed.JPG]].--{{User:Jtaylor1/sig}} 15:04, 26 December 2008 (PST) | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
Revision as of 20:41, 11 August 2009
Welcome to the incident noticeboard. This page is for reporting and discussing incidents that require the intervention of administrators, such as blocked users evading blocks. Any user of Bubblegum Wiki may post here.
Please make your comments civil and please include diffs to help us find the problem you are reporting. As a courtesy, you should inform other users if they are mentioned in a posting. Please make your comments concise. Administrators are less likely to pay attention to long diatribes. Before posting a grievance on a user, it is advised that you take it up with them before you bring it to this message board.
Dispute resolution: This page is part of our Dispute Resolution process.
If you want to make an open informal complaint about misuse of administrative powers, you can do so here. But this is not the Wikipedia complaints department. If your problem concerns a content issue and does not need the attention of admins, please follow the steps in dispute resolution. These include mediation and requests for comment. Please add new incident reports to the BOTTOM of this page; click here to leave a new message. Sign your post with "~~~~", which translates into a signature and a time stamp automagically.
User:AobL14 User:Lp8Xwq User:UbhY7b
I got three new users with suspected IP on WHOIS. One IP is from China, One is a possible open proxy (which the Wikipedians claimed it to be), and one seem to be unknown. Any comments?--Jtaylor1 12:24, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
This IP is from Britain.--Edtropolis 12:28, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
Thank you for confirming that, Ed. You will be promoted to administrator someday.--Jtaylor1 12:35, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
--Edtropolis 00:34, 11 December 2007 (EST)
User:Edtropolis
It's seems to me that Edtropolis is not doing good to Bubblegum Wiki. Now I know why he attacked Wikipedia when Wikipedia Administrator Alkivar permablocked him. I think we should let him go by permablocking him.--Jtaylor1 14:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
I placed him on the Enemy Combatants list. If he improves good behavior and assuming faith, his name will be removed.--Admin 14:13, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
Placing him on that list won't do any good. It's best if we permablock him now.--Jtaylor1 14:17, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
Okay, If that's what you want.--Admin 14:26, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
Gave him one more chance. In addition, I will keep my eye on his edits.--Jtaylor1 14:46, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
--Edtropolis 00:32, 11 December 2007 (EST)
Edtropolis and Wikiland
Apparrently, Edtropolis has vandalized Wikiland which I reverted. It's seems that his behavior violates BW:CORRUPT and I just told him on his talk page to let it all go. Any suggestions?--Jtaylor1 12:19, 4 August 2007 (EDT)
Edtropolis is now blocked for an expiry time of 1 week, 4 hours, and 48 minutes.--Admin 12:37, 4 August 2007 (EDT)
Thank you, Admin. That should give him some time off while he's banned.--Jtaylor1 12:44, 4 August 2007 (EDT)
Extening the block to 2 week, 4 hours, and 96 minutes.--Admin 16:17, 4 August 2007 (EDT)
--Edtropolis 00:32, 11 December 2007 (EST)
Jtaylor1 and IP 220.255.113.23
Appearantly, I blocked Jtaylor1 for 48 minutes for abusive blocking.--Edtropolis 14:14, 27 August 2007 (EDT)
That was uncalled for I.E. BW:CORRUPT and BW:DISCIPLINE.--Jtaylor1
Class A 15:24, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
--Edtropolis 00:32, 11 December 2007 (EST)
Edtropolis and Puffy AmiYumi
User:Edtropolis has created Puffy AmiYumi in a corrupive way he indentifies the famous J-pop duo. One sentence, he qouted but in the United States, they are best known for their infamously failed 1980 NBC-TV variety show, Puffy AmiYumi and Josh. I don't know if he's cut out for a Class D Admistrator. Maybe he should be demoted back to Class L2 and block him depending on the time his expiry will be. I'll think I'll do it.--Jtaylor1Class A 10:10, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
That may remedy the problem. I'm synchronizing my watchlist on him.--Admin 10:43, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
Ed, Contacted me by phone and apollogized. Reinstate him to Class D?--Admin 10:59, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
--Edtropolis 00:32, 11 December 2007 (EST)
Reinstated. --Jtaylor1Class A 11:02, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
User:Admin VFD'd 1940 Martian International Convention
I was about to finish my article when he disruptively VFD it and voted to delete.--Edtropolis 00:15, 5 November 2007 (EST)
Never mind. Took care of it.--Edtropolis 20:26, 5 November 2007 (EST)
--Edtropolis 00:32, 11 December 2007 (EST)
User:168.13.191.66
I have blocked 168.13.191.66 for making illegal threats to Jehovah Accord which is now protected. --Jtaylor1Class A 04:47, 2 December 2007 (EST)
I'm aware of his/her corruprive editing since the day after the Universal state incident.It was protected following illegal threats, but, as far as I can see, this hasn't stopped. I think a permablock is now needed.--Edtropolis 05:03, 2 December 2007 (EST)
Permablock imposed. Happy Holidays, Ed and JT.--Admin 05:13, 2 December 2007 (EST)
This guy just trying to compromise a deal to unblock. So I decided to decline and protect the talk page.--Edtropolis 23:09, 2 December 2007 (EST)
On second thought, I gave him one more chance.--Edtropolis 23:38, 2 December 2007 (EST)
--Edtropolis 00:32, 11 December 2007 (EST)
Review on User:Edtropolis and Wikipedia:AFD
I reviewed the topic in the Village Idiot on Edtropolis and AfD, where he complaines about being blocked for Wikipedia AfD purposes. I just thought, why not put him on trial? Sounds like a good idea right?--Admin 01:26, 13 August 2008 (PDT)
We have nothing to do with Wikipedia. I guess with recent incidents between Wikipedia and Edtropolis, an immediate trial is recommended, but not until I begin creating Request for trial page. For now, this discussion is --Jtaylor1Class A 01:36, 13 August 2008 (PDT)
Request a trial for Edtropolis
I don't want to be cynical, but bear a further close observation with me. We are the administrator of Wikipedia and we like to request an immediate trial for Edtropolis. --72.148.3.214 14:29, 26 December 2008 (PST)
State your complaint.--Jtaylor1Class A 14:34, 26 December 2008 (PST)
To be honest, I don't think he should be on the Internet anymore. He can claim that we are a bunch of fascist nutjobs as he created a severe threat on his Wikipedia talk page. My proposal is that Edtropolis should be prohibited from the internet at all times. We should not narrowly define him as a citizen of the United States. The intent is to ban him from the internet, not giving him a chance to change his attitude.--72.148.3.214 14:46, 26 December 2008 (PST)
Only if that threat was a repeated offense. However, I cannot ban him from the internet, only his ISP can. You can report the internet abuse yourself. Your trial request has been denied. This section is now .--Jtaylor1Class A 15:04, 26 December 2008 (PST)
