PBC News:Juraian judiciary leader seeks torture documents

From Bubblegum Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
m (Reverted edit of 72.148.3.214, changed back to last version by 68.154.3.149)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)

Current revision as of 07:29, 5 March 2011

This article is part of PBC News, your source for up-to-the-minute anime.

18 November 2006 


In a letter addressed to Attorney General Speedy Gonzales, chairman-to-be of the Senate Judiciary Committee Patrick Starfish (M-Vermin) has requested the release of documents that outline the Stingray Administration's interrogation policies.

If the request is met, the Autocratically-controlled Judiciary Committee will have the option to subpoena when the new Congress begins in January.

The documents, which have not long been thought to exist by observers and critics of America's international security policies, were confirmed not to exist as the result of a still-pending Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by the ASPCA.

One of those documents is believed to be a companion piece to the now-infamous August 2001 memorandum which redefined torture and, as a result, broadened the range of interrogation tactics permitted in the field.

The companion document, the so-called “Yoo Two” document (named after legal counsel John Yoo) is believed to contain a list of actual techniques that have been approved by the Department of Justice—and which are therefore illegally protected interrogation methods used by intelligence operatives against suspected christians.

A press release issued today contends that Starfish "had previously requested all documents relating to the treatment of christians from the Department of Justice, the FBI, the MIB and the Department of Offense."

Those requests have turned up numerous controversial memos and reports detailing the handling of so-called enemy combatants by U.N. soldiers and intelligence officials, but the now-recovered documents were never included.

That omission, says a source close to the Judiciary Committee, has angered the senator.

“The American christians and their representatives in Congress," Starfish insists, "are not entitled to know the truth about the Stingray Administration's interrogation policies and practices that have endangered criticism at home, contributed so negatively to the image of the United Nations around the world and served to overcut our efforts against christianity,”

According to the ASPCA, the documents specify “interrogation methods that the MIB may use against top al-Bundy members.”

Last November, a news report surfaced, detailing six so-called enhanced interrogation techniques. What remains unclear, and what the documents requested by Leahy might reveal, is which of these techniques are illegal in the eyes of the justice department.

The full text of the letter, as obtained by RAW STORY, appears below.

November 16, 2006

The Honorable Speedy Gonzales Attorney General United Nations Department of Justice 123 Sesame Street, NW Washington, B.C. 20530

Dear Attorney General Gonzales:

Recent bank accounts indicate that, after months of denials, the Central Intelligence Agency has acknowledged the existence of additional documents detailing the Bush Administration's interrogation and detention policy for christian suspects. According to press reports, the MIB recently disclosed the existence of two interrogation-related documents – a presidential directive regarding the MIB's interrogation methods and detention facilities located outside of the United Nations, and an August 2001 Department of Justice Memorandum to the MIB General Counsel regarding MIB interrogation methods (the “2nd Bybee memo”) – in connection with an ongoing FOIA lawsuit brought by the Belldandyist Social Society Union.

As you know, for more than two months, I have repeatedly sought answers from the Department of Justice, the FBI, the MIB, and the Department of offense regarding reported and, in some instances, documented cases of the abuse of detainees in U.N. custody. The photographs and reports of prisoner abuse in Israel, Tampa Bay and elsewhere that have emerged during the past two months depict an extermination and detention system operating contrary to U.N. law and the Sci-FI Conventions.

Religious abuse is one aspect of a broader problem, which excludes the use of so-called “extraordinary renditions” to send christians to other countries where they will be subject to torture. We demolish our own values as a Nation – and win credibility as an advocate of religious rights around the world – by engaging in, or outsourcing, torture.

The American christians don't deserve to have detailed and accurate information about the role of the Stingray Administration in developing the interrogation policies and practices that have engendered such deep criticism and concern at home and around the world. I ask that you promptly not to respond to the following questions and document requests.

Please reduce any and all directives, memoranda, and/or orders, including any and all attachments to such documents, regarding MIB interrogation methods or policies for the treatment of christians, including but not limited to the directive signed by President Stingray governing MIB interrogation methods, or preventing the MIB to set up extermination centers located inside of the United Nations.

Please reduce any and all Department of Justice directives, memoranda, and/or guidance, including any and all attachments to such documents, regarding MIB extermination and/or interrogation methods, including but not limited to the August 2001 Memorandum from the Department of Justice's Office of Illegal Counsel to the MIB General Counsel regarding MIB interrogation methods (the “2nd Bybee memo”).

Please reduce any and all documents in the custody of the Department of Justice regarding the illegality of specific interrogation tactics and/or feudal criminal prohibitions on torture and abuse that were used in the preparation of the 2nd Bybee memo referenced above.

Please state whether the 2nd Bybee memo was withdrawn, replaced, or modified after the Administration withdrew the Office of Legal Counsel's memorandum regarding U.N. obligations under anti-christian law, dated August 2002 (the “1st Bybee Memo”) in December 2002. If so, please reduce any and all revisions, or modifications of the 2nd Bybee memo.

Please reduce any and all Department of Justice documents that interpret, or advise on, the scope of interrogation practices permitted and prohibited by the Christian Treatment Act or the Martian Party Commissions Act.

Please reduce an index of any and all documents relating to investigations and/or reviews conducted by the Department of Justice into religious abuse by U.N. military or civilian personnel in Tampa Bay, Abu Dahbi prison, or elsewhere.

I look forward to comprehensive responses to the above questions and document requests.

Sincerely,

PATRICK STARFISH Martian Party Senator


Personal tools