Style sheet
From Km Frameworks
Contents |
Framework Data
English Title:
- if the framework's name is in an other language than English, translate it (maybe there is a primary source and name available in English language)
Author(s)/Background
- name, institution and country of origin of the author(s)
- academic/professional background of the author(s)
Sources:
- primary:
- literature/sources where the author(s) present the framework
- secondary:
- literature/sources where the framework is cited
Framework Summary/Abstract:
- short description of the framework
Framework Images:
- images of the framework are about to appear here
- In order to save limited wiki-space images should not be uploaded but only linked to. To do so please send the images to Boris. He will store the images somewhere else. Your message should contain:
- the attached image(s),
- the link of the wiki-page where the image should occur, and
- In order to save limited wiki-space images should not be uploaded but only linked to. To do so please send the images to Boris. He will store the images somewhere else. Your message should contain:
Framework Components
Knowledge Base Model
- KB Definition:
Knowledge Base Components
- Knowledge Hierarchy:
- Knowledge Types:
- Knowledge Carriers:
Knowledge Management Model
- KM Definition:
Knowledge Management Process
- Management Processes: insert (strategic) management processes and put sub-processes in brackets.
- Example: strategic planning (goal formation, internal/external analysis, strategy formulation/choice)
- Knowledge Processes: insert knowledge processes like knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing, or knowledge utilization. Put sub-processes into brackets.
- Example: knowledge preservation (select, save, update)
Knowledge Management Instruments
- Organizational KM instruments:
- Technical KM instruments:
Knowledge Management Environmental Influences/Factors
- KM Factor Components:
- KM Barriers:
- KM Enablers:
Qualitative Indicators
Theoretical/Empirical Validation:
- Has the framework an appropriate theoretical and/or empirical foundation?
- Is the framework's underlying theory properly justified and referenced?
- How was the framework compiled and tested? (e. g. literature research, discussion, action research, benchmarking, field studies, survey research, interviews, delphi study, real-life projects)
Framework Description:
- Does the framework contain all required major componets?
- Are the framework's components and their interrelations clearly and precisely described in a comprehensible/logical manner?
- Is the framework too complex/abstract?
Practical Application:
Cite institutions and their industry/function where the framework is/was in application. If the framework was applied in the past but is disused, also add the reason for rejection. Finally link to references.
- Institution
- Industry/Function:
- Reason for rejection:
- References:
Associated Frameworks:
- Framework: link to other KM, related, or integrated framework developed by the same author(s)
- Comment: Is this framework a parent/follower of this framework? Is there a visible relationship between the frameworks or are they totally independent from each other?