Style sheet

From Km Frameworks

Contents

Framework Data

English Title:

if the framework's name is in an other language than English, translate it (maybe there is a primary source and name available in English language)


Author(s)/Background

name, institution and country of origin of the author(s)
  • academic/professional background of the author(s)


Sources:

primary:
  • literature/sources where the author(s) present the framework
secondary:
  • literature/sources where the framework is cited

Framework Summary/Abstract:

short description of the framework


Framework Images:

images of the framework are about to appear here
  • In order to save limited wiki-space images should not be uploaded but only linked to. To do so please send the images to Boris. He will store the images somewhere else. Your message should contain:
    • the attached image(s),
    • the link of the wiki-page where the image should occur, and

Framework Components

Knowledge Base Model

KB Definition:


Knowledge Base Components

Knowledge Hierarchy:
Knowledge Types:
Knowledge Carriers:


Knowledge Management Model

KM Definition:


Knowledge Management Process

  • Management Processes: insert (strategic) management processes and put sub-processes in brackets.
Example: strategic planning (goal formation, internal/external analysis, strategy formulation/choice)
  • Knowledge Processes: insert knowledge processes like knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing, or knowledge utilization. Put sub-processes into brackets.
Example: knowledge preservation (select, save, update)


Knowledge Management Instruments

  • Organizational KM instruments:
  • Technical KM instruments:


Knowledge Management Environmental Influences/Factors

  • KM Factor Components:
  • KM Barriers:
  • KM Enablers:


Qualitative Indicators

Theoretical/Empirical Validation:

Has the framework an appropriate theoretical and/or empirical foundation?
  • Is the framework's underlying theory properly justified and referenced?
  • How was the framework compiled and tested? (e. g. literature research, discussion, action research, benchmarking, field studies, survey research, interviews, delphi study, real-life projects)


Framework Description:

  • Does the framework contain all required major componets?
  • Are the framework's components and their interrelations clearly and precisely described in a comprehensible/logical manner?
  • Is the framework too complex/abstract?


Practical Application:

Cite institutions and their industry/function where the framework is/was in application. If the framework was applied in the past but is disused, also add the reason for rejection. Finally link to references.

  • Institution
  • Industry/Function:
  • Reason for rejection:
  • References:

Associated Frameworks:

  • Framework: link to other KM, related, or integrated framework developed by the same author(s)
  • Comment: Is this framework a parent/follower of this framework? Is there a visible relationship between the frameworks or are they totally independent from each other?
Personal tools
Style Sheet