Talk:Lord Raffles
From Charas Project
(Difference between revisions)
(→Notice) |
(→Notice) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This is bound to be a very controversial article. For now, I am protecting it, so any edits that you want made to the article will have to go here first. If you don't like it, then screw you: it's my wiki, and I'll do whatever the hell I want with it. [[User:Admin|Admin]] 23:41, 5 March 2007 (EST) | This is bound to be a very controversial article. For now, I am protecting it, so any edits that you want made to the article will have to go here first. If you don't like it, then screw you: it's my wiki, and I'll do whatever the hell I want with it. [[User:Admin|Admin]] 23:41, 5 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| - | :Actually, to make this Wiki as accurate and objective as possible, I think we should even add such articles, even though it might "fuel someone's ego".--[[User:GaryCXJk|GaryCXJk]] 14:11, 6 March 2007 (EST) | + | :Actually, to make this Wiki as accurate and objective as possible, I think we should even add such articles, even though it might "fuel someone's ego". |
| + | :But I do think the article looks horrid. It doesn't appeal to get read.--[[User:GaryCXJk|GaryCXJk]] 14:11, 6 March 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:12, 6 March 2007
Notice
Originally, we agreed to not make a Lord Raffles article, as it would only fuel his ego - but I now feel that it is unavoidable.
This is bound to be a very controversial article. For now, I am protecting it, so any edits that you want made to the article will have to go here first. If you don't like it, then screw you: it's my wiki, and I'll do whatever the hell I want with it. Admin 23:41, 5 March 2007 (EST)
- Actually, to make this Wiki as accurate and objective as possible, I think we should even add such articles, even though it might "fuel someone's ego".
- But I do think the article looks horrid. It doesn't appeal to get read.--GaryCXJk 14:11, 6 March 2007 (EST)
