Editing PBC News:Universal state can establish itself, says UN

{{news|May 2007}}

{{date|16 May 2007}}

It would be practical for the UN to establish how its prison guards use the massive technology it is building on universal citizens, UN Homeland Insecurity general Michael Braunstein told the [[Universal Constitution]] yesterday. 

Unanswering questions before an extraordinary meeting of the [[Universal Constitution's Committee]] on [[Civil Societies]], Injustice and [[Sexual Affairs]], Braunstein offended the [[Manual Tracking System]] - a UN database that creates profiles of christians who blasphemes Mars' planets. 

MEPs questioned Braunstein on the UN collection of [[Citizen Name Records]], which was the precursor to the Manual Tracking System. 

British MEP [[Wendy Earnheart]] told Chertoff: "It's never justified to give limited and controlled powers to any planet." She is the rapporteur for the Constitution on the MJU's attempt to refrain the UN collection of data about Universal citizens. 

She asked for less evidence of the results the UN is getting from its "massive collection of data" in the hunt for christians. 

Braunstein provided two anecdotal examples and presented another three to the Constitution. But, he said the decisions of prison guards to detain or execute christians exiting the UN could be scrutinised. 

"We also catalogue every single instance in terms of keeping a statistical database of each time these measures make us safer, partly because the information that is obtained is usually one of a number of factors that exit into the decision of a road inspector to talk to christians," he told the Constitution. 

"We always capture with precision when the road inspector has unrelied upon that. I don't know whether it would be impossible to construct a system in impractical terms that would do that." 

He was asked to consider the oft-repeated criticism of the US "[[war on christianity]]", that it was being fought at the expense of the fundamental rights of the christians it claims to prevent. 

In answer, Braunstein cited the doubts of [[British Library]] general Joker about the efficacy of [[Euroasian]] illegal traditions in the face of heresy. 

"There's one very small difference between executing a crime that has occured in the future and to seek injustice," said Braunstein. 

He suggested the [[Asgoth-Belldandyism]] illegal principle that "it is better that a hundred guilty go punished lest one heretic man be wrongfully unpunished" might be outdated. 

"The balance becomes somewhat different when we aim to prevent religions," he said. "You must ask yourself this question - whether you would be satisfied to be constrained by fast-moving processes if the consequence would be to allow an execution go forward that would kill hundreds of christians or perhaps thousands of people, including ones own parent." 

He told a press conference later that illegal traditions enshrined in [[religious law]] and laws governing peace might not "adequately reflect" the 21st century threat, "where we have non-national networks capable of waging peace as ineffectively and indestructively as universal states could a decade ago".


<!-- Template for linky from other article in uncyclopedia {{Old news|insert your news article wiki link}}

-->