User talk:AntiChrist
From Wikireligion
You should also be blocked. ForestH2 19:14, 18 February 2007 (EST)
- whatever, moron AntiChrist 17:26, 6 March 2007 (EST)
- I'm thinking checkuser when james re-sysops you. -- RyGuy (talk • contribs) 07:22, 23 February 2007 (EST)
- wtf are you talking about? AntiChrist 17:26, 6 March 2007 (EST)
- Checkuser results yield sockpuppetry. ForestH2 19:01, 26 February 2007 (EST)
- You don't know what the f**k you're talking about, and obviously have no experience with actually performing valid Checkusers. Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with onion routing, since I expect thats why many of use might occasionally share the same IP. AntiChrist 20:57, 26 February 2007 (EST)
- And you still should be blocked for [1] and your username. I'm leaving this place, so I may not reply again. ForestH2 22:00, 27 February 2007 (EST)
- again: whatever, moron AntiChrist 17:26, 6 March 2007 (EST)
- And you still should be blocked for [1] and your username. I'm leaving this place, so I may not reply again. ForestH2 22:00, 27 February 2007 (EST)
- You don't know what the f**k you're talking about, and obviously have no experience with actually performing valid Checkusers. Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with onion routing, since I expect thats why many of use might occasionally share the same IP. AntiChrist 20:57, 26 February 2007 (EST)
- Checkuser results yield sockpuppetry. ForestH2 19:01, 26 February 2007 (EST)
- wtf are you talking about? AntiChrist 17:26, 6 March 2007 (EST)
- I'm thinking checkuser when james re-sysops you. -- RyGuy (talk • contribs) 07:22, 23 February 2007 (EST)
Contents |
....
Do you have a Wikipedia account? If so may I see it? You are just causing trouble here - I highly suggest that you leave this place before someone blocks you. And don't respond saying wtf are you talking about or whatever, moron. I am very tempted to remove the messages from your talkpage. Greg 20:16, 6 March 2007 (EST)
- maybe i do, maybe i don't. what difference is it to you? and if someone i've never talked to makes some random comment about checkuser on my talk page, I'm gonna ask "wtf are you talking about" cuz i have no idea why he left that message here. and this is my talk page, and I can say what i want. AntiChrist 22:16, 6 March 2007 (EST)
A few things
First of all please do not call me "christian dude." Second Wiki's are not the "work of the devil" and I never said that. I was saying I got so into them I was not religious anymore. Lastly please make a new account and stop editing with this one. Many christians will find this offensive. Thanks a lot sir. Peace :) --Sir James Paul 23:05, 7 March 2007 (EST)
- I have looked at what you have said and that is the last straw. I need to block you. You may come back in another name if you will be constructive. Peace :) --Sir James Paul 23:19, 7 March 2007 (EST)
- That just doesn't make any sense! You block him, and then say its fine if he uses another username? Insane. Seven of nine 23:13, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- I'm giving you just one more chance. Next time you vandalise you will get blocked for a week. --Sir James Paul 20:27, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- Please do not troll Seven of Nine. --Sir James Paul 09:38, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- Oh, I have to run one more checkuser on him when I return to adminship. I know who he is a sock of now. Seven of nine, look at this person's edits. Horrible. Policy does not count for everything. ForestH2 10:57, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- "Policy does not count for everything" - well, that pretty much sums up how you and Sir James run your various wiki projects. You set grand policies and visions, and then just block & delete at will whenever you don't like what someone is doing or saying. Really, if you two don't want random people to come and be a part of your projects, you should just go create a website somewhere together rather than an open, public wiki. Seven of nine 17:13, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- Oh, I have to run one more checkuser on him when I return to adminship. I know who he is a sock of now. Seven of nine, look at this person's edits. Horrible. Policy does not count for everything. ForestH2 10:57, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- No he is not. --Sir James Paul 16:45, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- You don't seem to care about this user's contributions. First of all:
1. His username
2. His contributions.
3. His listening skills.
4. Main sockpuppetry.
Seven of nine, read this: 'Seven of nine, look at this person's edits. - yes, that makes it look like I am talking about you being a troll. Or does it? From now on, you should check contributions twice, look at all contributions, read over carefully, not a skim through. I make it very clear that I am not talking about you. I am going to go ahead and preform another checkuser result on him along with a few others who are basic sockpuppeters of AntiChrist. ForestH2 18:15, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- This is cute.
Username policy
Your username is now against the rules here, see Wikireligion:Username Policy. This means if you don't follow policies you will be blocked. ForestH2 22:10, 12 March 2007 (EST)
- First of all, new policies should be discussed and agreed upon by consensus, not unilaterally dictated by you (you are not God here). Second, you cannot simply make a new rule for the sole purpose of finding fault in my actions (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law). Third, my username is not "anti-religion, make fun of another religion, or insult another religion." See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AntiChrist & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Christ - the term appears in both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible and throughout history. It is a valid religious and historical term. AntiChrist 22:38, 12 March 2007 (EST)
- Yes, your username is anti-religion. AntiChrist, come on? If others disagree with the policy, they can question it, and decide if they want to delete it. Besides as Seven of nine said, I can't do anything because I created the policy after you created your username. ForestH2 09:58, 13 March 2007 (EST)
Comment
If any admin here feels that you are causing a problem they may block you without a warning. --Sir James Paul 22:12, 13 March 2007 (EST)
