MediaWiki talk:Currentrev-asof

From Universalwiki

(Difference between revisions)
(→QxJkeQWEnx: new section)
(→JTkKcMae: new section)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
wow thats real beauty of etrvyehing how cute and pure that is is just WOW wonderful!! i? have so much respect fot this man i'll hope that i can do the same thing as he! when i have a wonderful horse like that !!!
+
The fixed amount of Bitcoins make it an ovoibus candidate for a deflationary spiral and/or hoarding.  Bitcoints can function as a medium of exchange but not a store of value.  I think it's primarily used for buying drugs and child pornography anonymously and that will probably remain its niche.  Tinfoil hat crowds may disagree, but they vote for Ron Paul.
-
== QxJkeQWEnx ==
+
== JTkKcMae ==
-
Ray, you don't seem to understand that money is both an insevtment and a medium of exchange. The very reason money is sought as a medium of exchange is because it is something that everyone recognizes as having value.  Sure there is an element of psychology about this, but a belief in hard money, as opposed to fiat money, is due to a long history of monetary abuses.You also don't seem to understand the time preference of people.  Some people like to set aside present day production, in order to pay for some good or service in the future.  This is known as savings, not hoarding.  The term hoarding came about due to an idea called  velocity of money , a Keynesian idea that leaves much to be desired.People are saving bitcoins because they know the value will increase in the future. They way the system is set up is that more and more effort will be needed in the future to  mine  bitcoins, so that there will be a leveling off of the monetary supply.  When this happens, it will be interesting to see what happens. Austrian economists predict that prices will stabilize.  Also, given the irresponsibility of our political and economic leaders, bitcoins may attract followers as the dollar continues its slide to zero value.
+
You're saying that the price of bitocin will fall due to lack of demand, causing a recession.So how would a controlling body fix the recession by decreasing the value, if that was what caused the recession in this scenario?I kind of like the idea of the Fed not being able to print a ton of money to decrease the value of the currency I hold.On another note, until the value of bitocin stabilizes, it will not be a safe medium to store value long-term. But it is still a great method of transferring value between individuals securely over the internet.

Current revision as of 05:26, 30 August 2012

The fixed amount of Bitcoins make it an ovoibus candidate for a deflationary spiral and/or hoarding. Bitcoints can function as a medium of exchange but not a store of value. I think it's primarily used for buying drugs and child pornography anonymously and that will probably remain its niche. Tinfoil hat crowds may disagree, but they vote for Ron Paul.

[edit] JTkKcMae

You're saying that the price of bitocin will fall due to lack of demand, causing a recession.So how would a controlling body fix the recession by decreasing the value, if that was what caused the recession in this scenario?I kind of like the idea of the Fed not being able to print a ton of money to decrease the value of the currency I hold.On another note, until the value of bitocin stabilizes, it will not be a safe medium to store value long-term. But it is still a great method of transferring value between individuals securely over the internet.

Retrieved from "http://editthis.info/universalwiki/MediaWiki_talk:Currentrev-asof"
Personal tools