MediaWiki talk:Currentrev-asof

From Universalwiki

Revision as of 11:51, 27 August 2012 (edit) 193.56.15.139 (Talk) (GjXyKhwZvZdMJHN) ← Older edit		Current revision as of 05:26, 30 August 2012 (edit) (undo) 150.9.154.81 (Talk) (→JTkKcMae: new section)
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	I run several sites also and go thgruoh the same process of a confirmation by me in the back end before it goes live advice for comments leaving informative and useful comments. I find myself fighting off the spammers at every corner. I believe that there should be a certain etiquette in commenting on blogs and this article certainly provides a great deal of useful information.	+	The fixed amount of Bitcoins make it an ovoibus candidate for a deflationary spiral and/or hoarding.  Bitcoints can function as a medium of exchange but not a store of value.  I think it's primarily used for buying drugs and child pornography anonymously and that will probably remain its niche. Tinfoil hat crowds may disagree, but they vote for Ron Paul.
		+
		+	== JTkKcMae ==
		+
		+	You're saying that the price of bitocin will fall due to lack of demand, causing a recession.So how would a controlling body fix the recession by decreasing the value, if that was what caused the recession in this scenario?I kind of like the idea of the Fed not being able to print a ton of money to decrease the value of the currency I hold.On another note, until the value of bitocin stabilizes, it will not be a safe medium to store value long-term. But it is still a great method of transferring value between individuals securely over the internet.

---

Current revision as of 05:26, 30 August 2012

The fixed amount of Bitcoins make it an ovoibus candidate for a deflationary spiral and/or hoarding. Bitcoints can function as a medium of exchange but not a store of value. I think it's primarily used for buying drugs and child pornography anonymously and that will probably remain its niche. Tinfoil hat crowds may disagree, but they vote for Ron Paul.

[edit] JTkKcMae

You're saying that the price of bitocin will fall due to lack of demand, causing a recession.So how would a controlling body fix the recession by decreasing the value, if that was what caused the recession in this scenario?I kind of like the idea of the Fed not being able to print a ton of money to decrease the value of the currency I hold.On another note, until the value of bitocin stabilizes, it will not be a safe medium to store value long-term. But it is still a great method of transferring value between individuals securely over the internet.