Barbara Shack

From Rationalwikiwki

(Difference between revisions)
(cat)
Line 3: Line 3:
Her oddly-worded articles are entirely obsessed with relentless, bitter criticism of the Roman Catholic Church.  She frequently seems to operate in some sort of vacuum: possibly because other editors don't want to validate her work by correcting it, (with the possible exception of [[Human]]'s complete refactoring, and forced trimming-down, of the previously tedious, tendentious "Magdalene laundries" article.) or because they fear being struck down by [[AKjeldsen]] if they encourage her.
Her oddly-worded articles are entirely obsessed with relentless, bitter criticism of the Roman Catholic Church.  She frequently seems to operate in some sort of vacuum: possibly because other editors don't want to validate her work by correcting it, (with the possible exception of [[Human]]'s complete refactoring, and forced trimming-down, of the previously tedious, tendentious "Magdalene laundries" article.) or because they fear being struck down by [[AKjeldsen]] if they encourage her.
-
At any rate, even the most radical atheists on the site (such as [[Bob M]] or [[SusanG]]) seem in no hurry to hang out with her.  In any event, she shows an [[Icewedge]]-like disdain for comments, so communicating with her would not be easy.
+
At any rate, even the most radical atheists on the site (such as [[Bob M]] or [[SusanG]]) seem in no hurry to hang out with her.  In any event, she shows an [[Icewedge]]-like [[Headless Chicken Mode|disdain for comments]], so communicating with her would not be easy.
[[Category:Significant RationalWikians]]
[[Category:Significant RationalWikians]]

Revision as of 19:34, 5 March 2008

Barbara Shack is one of the members of that already strange group of users that make up RationalWiki.

Her oddly-worded articles are entirely obsessed with relentless, bitter criticism of the Roman Catholic Church. She frequently seems to operate in some sort of vacuum: possibly because other editors don't want to validate her work by correcting it, (with the possible exception of Human's complete refactoring, and forced trimming-down, of the previously tedious, tendentious "Magdalene laundries" article.) or because they fear being struck down by AKjeldsen if they encourage her.

At any rate, even the most radical atheists on the site (such as Bob M or SusanG) seem in no hurry to hang out with her. In any event, she shows an Icewedge-like disdain for comments, so communicating with her would not be easy.

Personal tools