Talk:326
From Nomicapolis
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Clarification and the creation of a method of controlling discussion length and the calling of a vote.
Debate
Wouldn't this make a better amendment to part 1 of rule 303? --Dayd 15:30, 25 November 2006 (EST)
313 would have as well, but it is its own rule, and thus, this is an amendment to that rule. --TomFoolery 19:23, 25 November 2006 (EST)
I have amended the proposal to include 313 and 303. If this proposal is ratified, both of those rules will go away, and this will replace them. It now contains all of the parts of both of those rules, with some minor modifications (the same one's as before). --TomFoolery 10:22, 26 November 2006 (EST)
Um...now it breaks rule 111 since it contains 2 amendments. If you want to amend 313 just start there and then afterward we'll amend 303. --Dayd 11:01, 26 November 2006 (EST)
Now it is one rule change again, and I will propose the repeal of 303 if this passes.Thanks. --TomFoolery 11:09, 26 November 2006 (EST)
Wow...its almost like an i.m. --Tucana25 11:16, 26 November 2006 (EST)
So now it is an amendment to 303 since it has part 4 and 5, but it is amending 313 instead. So it either should amend 303 or have part 4 and 5 removed. --Dayd 11:20, 26 November 2006 (EST)
I have removed anything close to 303 and moved it to a new proposal. --TomFoolery 12:26, 26 November 2006 (EST)
This is the final form of the proposal, please vote at this time. --TomFoolery 15:56, 26 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
- --TomFoolery 15:57, 26 November 2006 (EST)
- --Shivan 06:36, 27 November 2006 (EST)
- --Tucana25 20:03, 27 November 2006 (EST)
- Applejuicefool 00:29, 28 November 2006 (EST); (Good one).
Against
- --Dayd 18:11, 26 November 2006 (EST)
