Letter to Mr David Nicholson
From Nhs It Info
School of Computing Science
Middlesex University
Hendon Campus
The Burroughs
London NW4 4BT
Tel: +44 (0)20 8411 5000
Fax: +44 (0)20 8411 6411
Email: @mdx.ac.uk
David Nicholson CBE
Chief Executive of the NHS
Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London SW1A 2NS
29 November 2006
Dear Mr Nicholson
We are writing to you on behalf of the group of 23 senior academics in computing and systems who have over recent months been expressing their urgent concerns about the National Programme for IT in the NHS (NPfIT).
In April we wrote to the Select Committee on Health to say that we believed that NPfIT was showing many of the symptoms we had seen in major IT systems that had been cancelled, had overrun massively, had failed to deliver an acceptable service to intended users or had failed to reach business benefit targets for their organisations. We asked the Committee to call for an independent review of NPfIT and to publish the results. A group of us met Dr Granger and his team in April and explained our concerns. Dr Granger agreed that a constructive independent review such as we proposed could be helpful.
Since we first voiced our concerns, subsequent problems, including those with suppliers, have increased our anxieties. People working within NPfIT, at many levels, have contacted us giving details of specific problems. It also seems clear that NPfIT has failed to gain the confidence and support of large numbers of the NHS community. We are confident, however, that an independent review would identify the main underlying technical and managerial problems, help provide solutions and bolster confidence. Our experience of technical reviews of major computing projects is that, when carried out professionally and dispassionately, they more than repay the time and cost involved.
We are delighted now to learn that the Select Committee has decided to hold an inquiry. It may be some time, however, before its results are published. We are also heartened, therefore, to hear via the press that you have commissioned a confidential internal review. We would be pleased to present evidence, written and/or oral, for submission to the review if you would find it useful, given that your review is likely to be completed in advance of the Committee’s inquiry.
For the avoidance of any misunderstanding, we would like to make it clear that our group is not seeking to review NPfIT ourselves. We are entirely independent of NPfIT. We are acting out of strong professional concern and, we believe, in the public interest.
Yours sincerely
Michael Smith |
Colin Tully |
Also on behalf of:
Ross Anderson James Backhouse David Bustard Ewart Carson Patrik O’Brian Holt Roland Ibbett Ray Ison Achim Jung Frank Land Bev Littlewood John A McDermid |
Julian Newman Brian Randell Uday Reddy Peter Ryan Geoffrey Sampson Martin Shepperd Tony Solomonides Ian Sommerville Harold Thimbleby Martyn Thomas |