List of characters
From Mariopedia
(→G) |
(→R) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
*[[Funky Kong]] | *[[Funky Kong]] | ||
- | + | Ink:What's funny is how Obama has to shuffle to plasee you in the least. During the primaries they both talked out the side of their mouths, and now he is embracing McCain, and he' still wrong. He could become a conservative today, and you would think he was a secret cell operative. You called him a liar for the 47 million uninsured, and now it's corrected, and he's still evil.Let me get this right and in stone, so that we can come back to it in 2012. Your prediction is that Obama is going use the courts to allow coverage for illegal aliens. Am I correct? So he will repeal laws set by Bush to limit coverage to illegal aliens, then plant certain cases to go through the system so that his high court appointees can over turn legislation regarding illegal aliens, and somehow get the other seven justices that are not his appointees to vote in his favor as well. That is my understanding, is that correct? I'm not sure how that is going to get him re-elected, and I'm not sure how he would get that past the conservatives, the moderates, and the independents. He barely has enough votes for the health care reform, a platform he ran on, so I can't wait to see how that will work.As we speak, he has just met with Blue Dogs to include a process of verification to ensure illegals will be excluded, and those that do not have a SS# will have to use other legal forms of ID. So instead of arguing with you, I'm just going to watch, and see if your prediction comes true... | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
==H== | ==H== | ||
Line 52: | Line 46: | ||
*[[Jerry]] | *[[Jerry]] | ||
- | + | Gasul from HN continued: Open socrue code tends to give a false sense of security. Many people assume others will check the code, yet few do. In addition, it is possible to spread malicious code throughout a code base to prevent detection.Those few who do are usually enough. Closed-socrue code gives a false sense of security. There are way more exploits for closed socrue code and they tend to take longer to fix.To use TOR you still connect through an ISP. That can be tracked and deep packet analysis can be done. TOR is not a magic bullet.Untrue. Deep packet won't see anything besides an encrypted connection. If you use Tor bridges nobody will know you're connecting to Tor.Why else would one use an anonymous currency unless they don't want to be detected?It isn't an anonymous currency. That's the main misconception about Bitcoin. Bitcoin can be anonymous using Tor. Just like the web can be anonymous using Tor. But the web isn't anonymous per se, and so isn't Bitcoin.Again, the main point of Bitcoin is how disruptive it is for the banking industry. It makes micropayments easy, it makes transactions among individuals easy and decentralized, etc. It disrupts their business models based on an oligopoly.Why would you use Bitcoin? Because you can:- Be anonymous if you want, but you don't have to.- Transfer money to someone, overseas, without any fees.- Charge money for your business without paying horrendous credit card or Paypal fees.- Stash your money securely in case of Government collapse (think Argentina 10 years ago, Belarus 2 weeks ago, or Greece very soon)- Make confiscation impossible if you leave in a corrupt country.- Make micropayments (like tips) without fees.- Buy stuff online from overseas (people are doing this with a NewEgg proxy that accept bitcoins)And there are many more use cases that I'm probably forgetting right now. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | Why does this have to be the ONLY reillbae source? Oh well, gj! | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
==P== | ==P== | ||
+ | *[[Paragoomba]] | ||
*[[Parakarry]] | *[[Parakarry]] | ||
+ | *[[Parakoopa]] | ||
*[[Peach]] | *[[Peach]] | ||
*[[Petey Piranha]] | *[[Petey Piranha]] | ||
- | + | First off I do not agree with exchanges or banks they both need to go away. I find it hliarious every time one of them gets hacked. What you argue about an exchange owner of bitcoin raising the exchange rate by 5 cents to make a profit is nothing illegal. Gas stations do the same thing, they value their gas at what price they want, that's why gas 2 miles down the road can cost 20 cents more or less. A farmers market will value their produce at insanely higher prices then walmart because of higher quality. Furthermore, people that sell bitcoin on Ebay have significantly different values then exchanges. I've seen 1 BTC sell as high $30 and the exchange rate as at $11. The real issue here is not the worth of bitcoins but the cost of exchange to cash. Clearly the answer is to eliminate the need to exchange to cash entirely and earn wages with bitcoin and buy goods and services directly with bitcoin. Perhaps you can write an article describing in great detail what jobs you can work for that pay in bitcoin and and list ways one would use their bitcoins to pay for food, housing, internet, etc. This would be more beneficial to people then stirring a pot of rumors and crying wolf about the exchanges. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
==S== | ==S== |
Current revision as of 10:09, 17 January 2013
There are many characters in the Mario series. Here is a list of them.
Contents |
[edit] B
- Bowser
- Bowser Jr.
- Baby Luigi
- Baby Mario
- Baby Peach
- Baby Daisy
- Baby Wario
- Baby Bowser
- Baby Donkey Kong
- Baby Yoshi
- Birdo
- Blooey
- Bomberto
- Boo
- Bow
[edit] C
[edit] D
[edit] F
Ink:What's funny is how Obama has to shuffle to plasee you in the least. During the primaries they both talked out the side of their mouths, and now he is embracing McCain, and he' still wrong. He could become a conservative today, and you would think he was a secret cell operative. You called him a liar for the 47 million uninsured, and now it's corrected, and he's still evil.Let me get this right and in stone, so that we can come back to it in 2012. Your prediction is that Obama is going use the courts to allow coverage for illegal aliens. Am I correct? So he will repeal laws set by Bush to limit coverage to illegal aliens, then plant certain cases to go through the system so that his high court appointees can over turn legislation regarding illegal aliens, and somehow get the other seven justices that are not his appointees to vote in his favor as well. That is my understanding, is that correct? I'm not sure how that is going to get him re-elected, and I'm not sure how he would get that past the conservatives, the moderates, and the independents. He barely has enough votes for the health care reform, a platform he ran on, so I can't wait to see how that will work.As we speak, he has just met with Blue Dogs to include a process of verification to ensure illegals will be excluded, and those that do not have a SS# will have to use other legal forms of ID. So instead of arguing with you, I'm just going to watch, and see if your prediction comes true...
[edit] H
[edit] J
Gasul from HN continued: Open socrue code tends to give a false sense of security. Many people assume others will check the code, yet few do. In addition, it is possible to spread malicious code throughout a code base to prevent detection.Those few who do are usually enough. Closed-socrue code gives a false sense of security. There are way more exploits for closed socrue code and they tend to take longer to fix.To use TOR you still connect through an ISP. That can be tracked and deep packet analysis can be done. TOR is not a magic bullet.Untrue. Deep packet won't see anything besides an encrypted connection. If you use Tor bridges nobody will know you're connecting to Tor.Why else would one use an anonymous currency unless they don't want to be detected?It isn't an anonymous currency. That's the main misconception about Bitcoin. Bitcoin can be anonymous using Tor. Just like the web can be anonymous using Tor. But the web isn't anonymous per se, and so isn't Bitcoin.Again, the main point of Bitcoin is how disruptive it is for the banking industry. It makes micropayments easy, it makes transactions among individuals easy and decentralized, etc. It disrupts their business models based on an oligopoly.Why would you use Bitcoin? Because you can:- Be anonymous if you want, but you don't have to.- Transfer money to someone, overseas, without any fees.- Charge money for your business without paying horrendous credit card or Paypal fees.- Stash your money securely in case of Government collapse (think Argentina 10 years ago, Belarus 2 weeks ago, or Greece very soon)- Make confiscation impossible if you leave in a corrupt country.- Make micropayments (like tips) without fees.- Buy stuff online from overseas (people are doing this with a NewEgg proxy that accept bitcoins)And there are many more use cases that I'm probably forgetting right now.
Why does this have to be the ONLY reillbae source? Oh well, gj!
[edit] P
First off I do not agree with exchanges or banks they both need to go away. I find it hliarious every time one of them gets hacked. What you argue about an exchange owner of bitcoin raising the exchange rate by 5 cents to make a profit is nothing illegal. Gas stations do the same thing, they value their gas at what price they want, that's why gas 2 miles down the road can cost 20 cents more or less. A farmers market will value their produce at insanely higher prices then walmart because of higher quality. Furthermore, people that sell bitcoin on Ebay have significantly different values then exchanges. I've seen 1 BTC sell as high $30 and the exchange rate as at $11. The real issue here is not the worth of bitcoins but the cost of exchange to cash. Clearly the answer is to eliminate the need to exchange to cash entirely and earn wages with bitcoin and buy goods and services directly with bitcoin. Perhaps you can write an article describing in great detail what jobs you can work for that pay in bitcoin and and list ways one would use their bitcoins to pay for food, housing, internet, etc. This would be more beneficial to people then stirring a pot of rumors and crying wolf about the exchanges.