Autopoiesis
From Km Frameworks
(Difference between revisions)
(→Definitions) |
(→Autopoiesis vs. Autonomy) |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Definitions== | ==Definitions== | ||
| - | *The theoretical construct definitive of the manner of operation of that class of systems that includes living systems. This term, combined from the Greek auto- (self) and poiesis (creation/production), was coined by Maturana in (approximately) 1972 (Cf. Maturana's comments in Maturana & Varela, 1980, p. xvii). Often loosely translated as 'self-creation' or 'self-production', the term connotes the process or dynamic by which an autopoietic machine / system maintains its autopoietic organization (via intrinsic processes of production of components realizing this particular organization). More specifically, autopoiesis is attributed to a machine (delineated as a a network of processes) which through that network of processes produces the components that: | + | *[[http://www.enolagaia.com/EA.html#A Encyclopaedia Autopoietica]] |
| - | + | :The theoretical construct definitive of the manner of operation of that class of systems that includes living systems. This term, combined from the Greek auto- (self) and poiesis (creation/production), was coined by Maturana in (approximately) 1972 (Cf. Maturana's comments in Maturana & Varela, 1980, p. xvii). Often loosely translated as 'self-creation' or 'self-production', the term connotes the process or dynamic by which an autopoietic machine / system maintains its autopoietic organization (via intrinsic processes of production of components realizing this particular organization). More specifically, autopoiesis is attributed to a machine (delineated as a a network of processes) which through that network of processes produces the components that: | |
| - | + | :*"(1) through their interactions and transformations continuously regenerate and realize the network of processes (relations) that produced them; and | |
| - | ... The difference between autonomy and autopoiesis is that autopoietic systems must produce their own components in addition to conserving their organization . Autonomous machines need only exhibit organizational closure, and they are not required to produce their own components as part of their operation. | + | :*(2) constitute it (the machine) as a concrete unity in the space in which they [the components] exist by specifying the topological domain of its realization as such a network." (Varela, 1979, p. 13) ... |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Autopoiesis vs. Autonomy== | ||
| + | The difference between autonomy and autopoiesis is that autopoietic systems must produce their own components in addition to conserving their organization . Autonomous machines need only exhibit organizational closure, and they are not required to produce their own components as part of their operation. [[http://www.enolagaia.com/EA.html#A Encyclopaedia Autopoietica]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <center>http://www.knowledge-management-jaeger.de/images/wiki/autopoiesis_klimecki.gif</center> | ||
| + | <p align=right>[[http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/1999/339/html/klim10.html Klimecki, 1995, p. 9]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Related Terms== | ||
| + | [[system]]; [[systemic]] | ||
| - | |||
==Literature== | ==Literature== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 21: | ||
*Varela, F.: Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York: Elsevier, 1979. | *Varela, F.: Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York: Elsevier, 1979. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Klimecki, R. G.: Self-Organization as a New Paradigm in Management Science. Konstanz: Univ. Konstanz, Lehrstuhl für Management (Management Forschung und Praxis, Nr. 10), 1995. [available at: [http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/1999/339/html/klim10.html Link] (HTML), last access: 08/01/2006] | ||
Current revision as of 18:32, 15 November 2007
Contents |
Definitions
- The theoretical construct definitive of the manner of operation of that class of systems that includes living systems. This term, combined from the Greek auto- (self) and poiesis (creation/production), was coined by Maturana in (approximately) 1972 (Cf. Maturana's comments in Maturana & Varela, 1980, p. xvii). Often loosely translated as 'self-creation' or 'self-production', the term connotes the process or dynamic by which an autopoietic machine / system maintains its autopoietic organization (via intrinsic processes of production of components realizing this particular organization). More specifically, autopoiesis is attributed to a machine (delineated as a a network of processes) which through that network of processes produces the components that:
- "(1) through their interactions and transformations continuously regenerate and realize the network of processes (relations) that produced them; and
- (2) constitute it (the machine) as a concrete unity in the space in which they [the components] exist by specifying the topological domain of its realization as such a network." (Varela, 1979, p. 13) ...
Autopoiesis vs. Autonomy
The difference between autonomy and autopoiesis is that autopoietic systems must produce their own components in addition to conserving their organization . Autonomous machines need only exhibit organizational closure, and they are not required to produce their own components as part of their operation. [Encyclopaedia Autopoietica]
Related Terms
Literature
- Maturana, H.; Varela, F.: Autopoiesis and Cognition: the Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1980 (1st ed. 1973).
- Varela, F.: Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York: Elsevier, 1979.
- Klimecki, R. G.: Self-Organization as a New Paradigm in Management Science. Konstanz: Univ. Konstanz, Lehrstuhl für Management (Management Forschung und Praxis, Nr. 10), 1995. [available at: Link (HTML), last access: 08/01/2006]
