SS Workroom
From Bplsst
Dresdnhope (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Has anyone considered renaming the workroom "SST North Workroom", and "SST South Workroom", since SI and SS don't exist anymore--[[User:Dresdnhope|Dresdnhope]] 07:43, 1 February 2007 (EST) | Has anyone considered renaming the workroom "SST North Workroom", and "SST South Workroom", since SI and SS don't exist anymore--[[User:Dresdnhope|Dresdnhope]] 07:43, 1 February 2007 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I suspect it would be harder for people to remember. I for one do not think of the library in terms of north and south. If anything, I might designate the Eastern Parkway side as north and the Flatbush side as north. - DB | ||
+ | |||
+ | Once we name it, we'll remember it. The point is that unless someone makes a conscious decision to change the names, the old names will be perpetuated for thousands and thousands of years, even though they don't represent any organizational reality. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I think that we've been using those terms to identify the rooms to the IT, Maintenence and Custodial staff. I agree though that something so out of date should be changed. Could this be a subject for a reference meeting?-DP |
Current revision as of 15:55, 15 November 2007
Has anyone considered renaming the workroom "SST North Workroom", and "SST South Workroom", since SI and SS don't exist anymore--Dresdnhope 07:43, 1 February 2007 (EST)
I suspect it would be harder for people to remember. I for one do not think of the library in terms of north and south. If anything, I might designate the Eastern Parkway side as north and the Flatbush side as north. - DB
Once we name it, we'll remember it. The point is that unless someone makes a conscious decision to change the names, the old names will be perpetuated for thousands and thousands of years, even though they don't represent any organizational reality.
I think that we've been using those terms to identify the rooms to the IT, Maintenence and Custodial staff. I agree though that something so out of date should be changed. Could this be a subject for a reference meeting?-DP