Bluesockapedia

From Bluesockapedia

Revision as of 22:17, 27 June 2007 (view source) Admin (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 21:57, 14 July 2007 (view source) Corruption (Talk | contribs) (→Reasons Why Bluesockapedia is better than Wikipedia) Next diff →
Line 2:		Line 2:
	==Reasons Why Bluesockapedia is better than Wikipedia==		==Reasons Why Bluesockapedia is better than Wikipedia==
-	*It actually tells the truth.	+	*It actually tells the [[truth]].
	*It doesn't need a citation every two sentences.		*It doesn't need a citation every two sentences.
	*We don't believe in deleting pages. If it's funny, it stays.		*We don't believe in deleting pages. If it's funny, it stays.

---

Revision as of 21:57, 14 July 2007

Bluesockapedia is what you are reading now. If it isn't, I'd be worried. Really worried.

Reasons Why Bluesockapedia is better than Wikipedia

• It actually tells the truth.
• It doesn't need a citation every two sentences.
• We don't believe in deleting pages. If it's funny, it stays.
  • Then again, if it has text on the page, it stays.
• Is ran by monkeys, not hampsters.
• Believes Red Socking is worthy of an article.
• Believe more templates, the better.