Bluesockapedia

From Bluesockapedia

(Difference between revisions)
(Further Reading)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
==Further Reading==
==Further Reading==
-
*[[This needs an article]] - ''stuff that really needs an article. Let your creative output go nuts!''
+
*[[This needs an article]] - stuff that really needs an article. Let your creative output go nuts!
-
*[[Bluesockapedia:About|About Bluesockapedia]] - ''important, unfunny and serious stuff about Bluesockapedia''.
+
*[[Bluesockapedia:About|About Bluesockapedia]] - important, unfunny and serious stuff about Bluesockapedia.
[[Category: Bluesockapedia]]
[[Category: Bluesockapedia]]

Current revision as of 21:10, 20 November 2007

Bluesockapedia is what you are reading now. If it isn't, I'd be worried. Really worried.

Reasons Why Bluesockapedia is better than Wikipedia

  • It actually tells the truth.
  • It doesn't need a citation every two sentences.
  • We don't believe in deleting pages. If it's funny, it stays.
    • Then again, if it has text on the page, it stays.
  • Is ran by monkeys, not hampsters.
  • Believes Red Socking is worthy of an article.
  • Believe more templates, the better.

Further Reading

Personal tools