Bluesockapedia
From Bluesockapedia
(Difference between revisions)
(→Further Reading) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Further Reading== | ==Further Reading== | ||
- | *[[This needs an article]] - | + | *[[This needs an article]] - stuff that really needs an article. Let your creative output go nuts! |
- | *[[Bluesockapedia:About|About Bluesockapedia]] - | + | *[[Bluesockapedia:About|About Bluesockapedia]] - important, unfunny and serious stuff about Bluesockapedia. |
[[Category: Bluesockapedia]] | [[Category: Bluesockapedia]] |
Current revision as of 21:10, 20 November 2007
Bluesockapedia is what you are reading now. If it isn't, I'd be worried. Really worried.
Reasons Why Bluesockapedia is better than Wikipedia
- It actually tells the truth.
- It doesn't need a citation every two sentences.
- We don't believe in deleting pages. If it's funny, it stays.
- Then again, if it has text on the page, it stays.
- Is ran by monkeys, not hampsters.
- Believes Red Socking is worthy of an article.
- Believe more templates, the better.
Further Reading
- This needs an article - stuff that really needs an article. Let your creative output go nuts!
- About Bluesockapedia - important, unfunny and serious stuff about Bluesockapedia.