Talk:335
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Debate) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| - | + | So what does it mean to break the rules? Currently, players must abide by the rules ([[101]]), so would any rule breaker be fined 40 points, because they broke [[101]] in addition to whatever other rule? Should this rule entail honest mistakes, or just intentional rule-breaking? At any rate, I would like to see some kind of clause about reversing the actions of the rule-breaking in addition to any point penalty. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 09:20, 28 November 2006 (EST) | |
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 14:20, 28 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This is to give some sort of punishment to breaking the rules. As of now nothing happens if you break the rules aside from the action being declared invaild. --Dayd 18:35, 26 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
Add comments So what does it mean to break the rules? Currently, players must abide by the rules (101), so would any rule breaker be fined 40 points, because they broke 101 in addition to whatever other rule? Should this rule entail honest mistakes, or just intentional rule-breaking? At any rate, I would like to see some kind of clause about reversing the actions of the rule-breaking in addition to any point penalty. Applejuicefool 09:20, 28 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
