Talk:315/vote-archive-1
From Nomicapolis
< Talk:315(Difference between revisions)
Simulacrum (Talk | contribs) (→Debate: discussion link added) |
Simulacrum (Talk | contribs) m (forgot sig) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This has an "enact" template on it, shouldn't it have a "repeal" template? [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 12:57, 14 November 2006 (EST) | This has an "enact" template on it, shouldn't it have a "repeal" template? [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 12:57, 14 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| - | I have started a discussion on the matter [[Talk:Nomicopolis:Rules and proposals header boxes|here]]. | + | I have started a discussion on the matter [[Talk:Nomicopolis:Rules and proposals header boxes|here]]. [[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 01:06, 15 November 2006 (EST) |
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Current revision as of 06:06, 15 November 2006
I declare this proposal carried --Dayd 23:13, 14 November 2006 (EST)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
According to rule 209 we cannot have more than 25 mutable rules. I propose that we repeal this rule at least for the time being as we are approaching that number. However, I am open to increasing the limit if that is preferred. Simulacrum 17:44, 10 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
This has an "enact" template on it, shouldn't it have a "repeal" template? Applejuicefool 12:57, 14 November 2006 (EST)
I have started a discussion on the matter here. Simulacrum 01:06, 15 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
- --Shivan 06:53, 13 November 2006 (EST)
- Simulacrum 18:39, 13 November 2006 (EST)
- --Dayd 21:45, 13 November 2006 (EST)
Against
