Talk:321
From Nomicapolis
(→Debate) |
(→Debate) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The idea of a Judge is a good one, but with the limited number of active players it may be wise to amend the voting periodicity pending some future larger number of actives. --[[User: Tom Foolery|Tom Foolery]] 17:27, 22 November 2006 (EST) | The idea of a Judge is a good one, but with the limited number of active players it may be wise to amend the voting periodicity pending some future larger number of actives. --[[User: Tom Foolery|Tom Foolery]] 17:27, 22 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 04:08, 29 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This is to create an elected position of Judge. The Judge will be in charge of any rule disputes that may arise.
Debate
I think with both of the office suggestions, we are too few players. Almost half of the players will have an office, and have a lot of power. I think we should be more players before it is passed.--Shivan 13:13, 20 November 2006 (EST)
Well that is part of the reason behind these proposals. One is that we do need a Judge reguardless of what anyone may claim there will be situations that arise that will require some to officate. I am baffled how anyone manage to convince anyone that a Judge is not a required position. As for the Mayor that is to just make the game more interesting. --Dayd 21:51, 20 November 2006 (EST)
The idea of a Judge is a good one, but with the limited number of active players it may be wise to amend the voting periodicity pending some future larger number of actives. --Tom Foolery 17:27, 22 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
- --Dayd 20:24, 23 November 2006 (EST)
- Applejuicefool 21:57, 23 November 2006 (EST); (Good rule. There will need to be some precedents set, such as how the judge decides what constitutes a "problem").
- --TomFoolery 22:28, 23 November 2006 (EST)
