Talk:328
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) |
(→Debate) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Clause 4 should disenfranchise the player who made the ruling in question, not the current judge. Or am I missing something? [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 10:41, 24 November 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 15:41, 24 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
STARE DECISIS - Lat. "to stand by that which is decided." The principal that the precedent decisions are to be followed by the Judge.
To abide or adhere to decided cases. It is a general maxim that when a point has been settled by decision, it forms a precedent which is not afterwards to be departed from.
Debate
Clause 4 should disenfranchise the player who made the ruling in question, not the current judge. Or am I missing something? Applejuicefool 10:41, 24 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
