Talk:310
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→For) |
(→Against) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
=== Against === | === Against === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=5 Add AGAINST vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=5 Add AGAINST vote] | ||
| - | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | + | # --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 22:00, 28 October 2006 (EDT)<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> |
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
Revision as of 02:00, 29 October 2006
Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This amendment gives us the ability to allow plurality votes in the case where we have three or more options, such as if we enact a Governor General title and there are more than two contenders.
Debate
Add comments
Looks good to me. Simulacrum 20:19, 18 April 2006 (PDT)
Vote
For
- Applejuicefool 07:40, 22 April 2006 (PDT)
- Pugrins 16:53, 9 May 2006 (PDT)
Against
- --Dayd 22:00, 28 October 2006 (EDT)
