Talk:321

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(→Debate)
(repeal info)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
This rule was repealed by rule [[385]].
 +
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
Line 17: Line 19:
The idea of a Judge is a good one, but with the limited number of active players it may be wise to amend the voting periodicity pending some future larger number of actives.  --[[User: Tom Foolery|Tom Foolery]] 17:27, 22 November 2006 (EST)
The idea of a Judge is a good one, but with the limited number of active players it may be wise to amend the voting periodicity pending some future larger number of actives.  --[[User: Tom Foolery|Tom Foolery]] 17:27, 22 November 2006 (EST)
-
 
-
Based on the text of rule [[321]], actually...i believe there is a typo or grammatical mistake...but anyway: (if?) "At any time there is not an active player as judge a special vote for a new Judge will be immediately conducted."  That meant that the vote began at the moment the law passed.  I would also like to propose (unofficially, i guess) that should AJF be elected they be allowed to continue as Judge for the month of December instead of holding an additional vote on Dec 1. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:06, 28 November 2006 (EST)
 
<!--END DEBATE-->
<!--END DEBATE-->

Current revision as of 15:39, 10 May 2007

This rule was repealed by rule 385.


Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

This is to create an elected position of Judge. The Judge will be in charge of any rule disputes that may arise.

Debate

Add comments

I think with both of the office suggestions, we are too few players. Almost half of the players will have an office, and have a lot of power. I think we should be more players before it is passed.--Shivan 13:13, 20 November 2006 (EST)

Well that is part of the reason behind these proposals. One is that we do need a Judge reguardless of what anyone may claim there will be situations that arise that will require some to officate. I am baffled how anyone manage to convince anyone that a Judge is not a required position. As for the Mayor that is to just make the game more interesting. --Dayd 21:51, 20 November 2006 (EST)

The idea of a Judge is a good one, but with the limited number of active players it may be wise to amend the voting periodicity pending some future larger number of actives. --Tom Foolery 17:27, 22 November 2006 (EST)

Vote

For

Add FOR vote

  1. --Dayd 20:24, 23 November 2006 (EST)
  2. Applejuicefool 21:57, 23 November 2006 (EST); (Good rule. There will need to be some precedents set, such as how the judge decides what constitutes a "problem").
  3. --TomFoolery 22:28, 23 November 2006 (EST)



Against

Add AGAINST vote

Retrieved from "http://editthis.info/Nomicapolis/Talk:321"
Personal tools