Talk:351
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
Mike Rosoft (Talk | contribs) (Vote: 351 - for) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Since rules are getting broken into fractions by [[319]], it's probably prudent to keep anyone from treating their votes as fungible. | Since rules are getting broken into fractions by [[319]], it's probably prudent to keep anyone from treating their votes as fungible. | ||
--[[User:Chuck|Chuck]] 20:45, 6 December 2006 (EST) | --[[User:Chuck|Chuck]] 20:45, 6 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I declare this proposal passed. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 17:17, 15 December 2006 (EST) | ||
== Debate == | == Debate == | ||
| Line 20: | Line 22: | ||
# --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 13:55, 12 December 2006 (EST) | # --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 13:55, 12 December 2006 (EST) | ||
#[[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 06:20, 14 December 2006 (EST) | #[[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 06:20, 14 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| - | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | + | # [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 10:10, 14 December 2006 (EST) |
| + | <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
Current revision as of 22:17, 15 December 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Proposer: Add your summary here Debate for this Proposal shall end 00:00, 10 December 2006 (EST)
Since rules are getting broken into fractions by 319, it's probably prudent to keep anyone from treating their votes as fungible. --Chuck 20:45, 6 December 2006 (EST)
I declare this proposal passed. --Tucana25 17:17, 15 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
Vote
Debate has closed -- this proposal must now be voted on. chuck 11:41, 11 December 2006 (EST)
For
- chuck 11:41, 11 December 2006 (EST)
- --TomFoolery 13:55, 12 December 2006 (EST)
- Mike Rosoft 06:20, 14 December 2006 (EST)
- Applejuicefool 10:10, 14 December 2006 (EST)
Against
- --Dayd 21:09, 11 December 2006 (EST) (I really do think about it before I vote against it)
- --Tucana25 23:11, 12 December 2006 (EST)
Abstain
