Talk:343
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→For) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Probably should include "precedence over every other rule determining inactivity" --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 19:10, 1 December 2006 (EST) | Probably should include "precedence over every other rule determining inactivity" --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 19:10, 1 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| - | Debate is closed. This | + | Debate is closed. This proposal must now be voted on. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 10:12, 5 December 2006 (EST) |
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
== Vote == | == Vote == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I declare this proposal approved. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 18:56, 8 December 2006 (EST) | ||
=== For === | === For === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | ||
# [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 10:12, 5 December 2006 (EST) | # [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 10:12, 5 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | # --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 22:27, 5 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | # [[User:Chuck|Chuck]] 14:45, 6 December 2006 (EST) | ||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
| Line 25: | Line 29: | ||
=== Against === | === Against === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=5 Add AGAINST vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=5 Add AGAINST vote] | ||
| + | # --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 16:01, 7 December 2006 (EST) | ||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
Current revision as of 23:56, 8 December 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This rule is designed to allow the game to recover more quickly should it go into a state of decline. I do not believe that we should quibble about such things as half-votes and extra limits on proposals if the player count drops much below what it is currently. Applejuicefool 11:44, 1 December 2006 (EST)
Debate on this proposal will end at 11 p.m. on Monday, Dec. 4, 2006. Applejuicefool 11:45, 1 December 2006 (EST)
- Good point, Dayd. I'll fix it now. Applejuicefool 21:34, 1 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
Add comments Probably should include "precedence over every other rule determining inactivity" --Dayd 19:10, 1 December 2006 (EST)
Debate is closed. This proposal must now be voted on. Applejuicefool 10:12, 5 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
I declare this proposal approved. --Tucana25 18:56, 8 December 2006 (EST)
For
- Applejuicefool 10:12, 5 December 2006 (EST)
- --Tucana25 22:27, 5 December 2006 (EST)
- Chuck 14:45, 6 December 2006 (EST)
Against
- --TomFoolery 16:01, 7 December 2006 (EST)
