Talk:343

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 03:27, 6 December 2006 (view source) Tucana25 (Talk | contribs) (→For) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 19:45, 6 December 2006 (view source) Chuck (Talk | contribs) (→For) Next diff →
Line 20:		Line 20:
	# [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 10:12, 5 December 2006 (EST)		# [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 10:12, 5 December 2006 (EST)
	# --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 22:27, 5 December 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 22:27, 5 December 2006 (EST)
		+	# [[User:Chuck|Chuck]] 14:45, 6 December 2006 (EST)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

---

Revision as of 19:45, 6 December 2006

Contents 1 Proposer's summary and declarations 2 Debate 3 Vote 3.1 For 3.2 Against

Proposer's summary and declarations

This rule is designed to allow the game to recover more quickly should it go into a state of decline. I do not believe that we should quibble about such things as half-votes and extra limits on proposals if the player count drops much below what it is currently. Applejuicefool 11:44, 1 December 2006 (EST)

Debate on this proposal will end at 11 p.m. on Monday, Dec. 4, 2006. Applejuicefool 11:45, 1 December 2006 (EST)

Good point, Dayd. I'll fix it now. Applejuicefool 21:34, 1 December 2006 (EST)

Debate

Add comments Probably should include "precedence over every other rule determining inactivity" --Dayd 19:10, 1 December 2006 (EST)

Debate is closed. This propsoal must now be voted on. Applejuicefool 10:12, 5 December 2006 (EST)

Vote

For

Add FOR vote

1. Applejuicefool 10:12, 5 December 2006 (EST)
2. --Tucana25 22:27, 5 December 2006 (EST)
3. Chuck 14:45, 6 December 2006 (EST)

Against

Add AGAINST vote