Talk:343
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This rule is designed to allow the game to recover more quickly should it go into a state of decline. I do not believe that we should quibble about such things as half-votes and extra limits on proposals if the player count drops much below what it is currently. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 11:44, 1 December 2006 (EST) | This rule is designed to allow the game to recover more quickly should it go into a state of decline. I do not believe that we should quibble about such things as half-votes and extra limits on proposals if the player count drops much below what it is currently. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 11:44, 1 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| - | Debate on this | + | Debate on this proposal will end at 11 p.m. on Monday, Dec. 4, 2006. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 11:45, 1 December 2006 (EST) |
== Debate == | == Debate == | ||
Revision as of 16:46, 1 December 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This rule is designed to allow the game to recover more quickly should it go into a state of decline. I do not believe that we should quibble about such things as half-votes and extra limits on proposals if the player count drops much below what it is currently. Applejuicefool 11:44, 1 December 2006 (EST)
Debate on this proposal will end at 11 p.m. on Monday, Dec. 4, 2006. Applejuicefool 11:45, 1 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
Vote
For
Against
