CW8:5267
From Environmental Technology
Jalcst-5267 (Talk | contribs) |
m (missing the point on some answers) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Graded}} | ||
OUR OPINION: Smart growth vs. sprawl. | OUR OPINION: Smart growth vs. sprawl. | ||
| + | {{OK 2}} | ||
A. Helping improve the quality of life (not enough family or personal time). In order to make the program work almost everyone in the community would have to just about completely change their entire way of life. | A. Helping improve the quality of life (not enough family or personal time). In order to make the program work almost everyone in the community would have to just about completely change their entire way of life. | ||
| + | {{OK 2}} | ||
B. It seems that the community this is occuring in is to much concerned with trying to make themselves out to be something their not just in order to get new businesses in the area, but if this were to happen in my community I would just try to get people to be theirselves, if you have to lie to get someone or some company to notice you you are just lieing to yourself. | B. It seems that the community this is occuring in is to much concerned with trying to make themselves out to be something their not just in order to get new businesses in the area, but if this were to happen in my community I would just try to get people to be theirselves, if you have to lie to get someone or some company to notice you you are just lieing to yourself. | ||
Scientists Hail San Francisco's Significant Natural Resource Areas Management Plan | Scientists Hail San Francisco's Significant Natural Resource Areas Management Plan | ||
| + | {{OK 3}} | ||
C. The positives to this plan would be the great impact it would have on the environment. | C. The positives to this plan would be the great impact it would have on the environment. | ||
| + | {{OK 3}} | ||
D. People may not want to adjust their lives in order to support the program. | D. People may not want to adjust their lives in order to support the program. | ||
| - | E. I think that it is a possible solution if the community is willing to adjust their standard of living in order to make it work. In the case of it working in a city like San | + | {{OK}} |
| + | E. I think that it is a possible solution if the community is willing to adjust their standard of living in order to make it work. In the case of it working in a city like San Francisco it would definately be harder to make work as oppose to a small town like West Frankfort. | ||
Current revision as of 13:48, 3 April 2006
|
G |
OUR OPINION: Smart growth vs. sprawl.
| +2 |
A. Helping improve the quality of life (not enough family or personal time). In order to make the program work almost everyone in the community would have to just about completely change their entire way of life.
| +2 |
B. It seems that the community this is occuring in is to much concerned with trying to make themselves out to be something their not just in order to get new businesses in the area, but if this were to happen in my community I would just try to get people to be theirselves, if you have to lie to get someone or some company to notice you you are just lieing to yourself.
Scientists Hail San Francisco's Significant Natural Resource Areas Management Plan
| +3 |
C. The positives to this plan would be the great impact it would have on the environment.
| +3 |
D. People may not want to adjust their lives in order to support the program.
| OK |
E. I think that it is a possible solution if the community is willing to adjust their standard of living in order to make it work. In the case of it working in a city like San Francisco it would definately be harder to make work as oppose to a small town like West Frankfort.
