Editing Cw6:8299
From Environmental Technology
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Current revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | |||
Click on the article, "Hurricanes vs. Homes: Should Building on U.S. Coasts Be Stopped?" Discuss the article's point of view, and how it pertains to population, environment, and ethics. (10 points) | Click on the article, "Hurricanes vs. Homes: Should Building on U.S. Coasts Be Stopped?" Discuss the article's point of view, and how it pertains to population, environment, and ethics. (10 points) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
b) Click on the article, "China Makes Stable Energy Supplies Top Priority for Economic Planning" Discuss the article's point of view, and how it pertains to population, environment, and ethics. (10 points) | b) Click on the article, "China Makes Stable Energy Supplies Top Priority for Economic Planning" Discuss the article's point of view, and how it pertains to population, environment, and ethics. (10 points) | ||
| - | + | ||
a: This article is discussing rather or not we should be able to rebuild homes and buildings around coastal areas without strict building codes. The point of view is people should be able to rebuild their homes wherever they want to and have a right to. It raises the question should we as taxpayers be responsible for paying for the damages caused by hurricanes or should it be only those who live by the coastal area and ocean be the ones who have to pay for it. We can't control the environment and all natural disaters such as hurricanes, but can predict them. Many die in these disaters and decrease the population sometimes by thousands. Many need help and since we pay taxes anyways, I believe that the money should go to those in need for survival. | a: This article is discussing rather or not we should be able to rebuild homes and buildings around coastal areas without strict building codes. The point of view is people should be able to rebuild their homes wherever they want to and have a right to. It raises the question should we as taxpayers be responsible for paying for the damages caused by hurricanes or should it be only those who live by the coastal area and ocean be the ones who have to pay for it. We can't control the environment and all natural disaters such as hurricanes, but can predict them. Many die in these disaters and decrease the population sometimes by thousands. Many need help and since we pay taxes anyways, I believe that the money should go to those in need for survival. | ||
| - | |||
b:China is striving to capture carbon dioxide coal burning power plants to prevent air pollution. This is a growing risk for global warming. They want to be more efficient enhancing energy and protect the environment by using renewable energy, and by reducing waste to improve safety and security. This pretains to ethics because by improving all these environmental factors will enhance growth and provide more jobs for people. Less population and more jobs will cause the population to increase more and more. | b:China is striving to capture carbon dioxide coal burning power plants to prevent air pollution. This is a growing risk for global warming. They want to be more efficient enhancing energy and protect the environment by using renewable energy, and by reducing waste to improve safety and security. This pretains to ethics because by improving all these environmental factors will enhance growth and provide more jobs for people. Less population and more jobs will cause the population to increase more and more. | ||
