Super Sam accidentally the entire Wiki User Wiki.

From Wuw Archive

Current revision as of 23:11, 4 January 2010

Adventure 1

DM:Heian | Group: Player 1 (stats), Player 2 (stats) | Location: Generic Location

CHAOS: Now, let's pick names. I'll be Heian. And this adventure's DM.

P1:

Chaos:

P2:

Chatter

I'll be Kanjiro. Duh. This is where we put all the "off topics". When you play the game you must take turns, it would go: DM, P1, DM, P2. You do not have to take turns in "Chatter".

Chaos' format(I wanted to show you what it was}

Players: P1, P2

Order of turns: P1, P2

Location: {Insert location here!}

Adventure

CHAOS: People say stuff like this.

{ALL actions be like this}

Battle!

P1: {Action}

P2: {Action}

Monster: {Action}

Wiinings

Adventure

CHAOS: Then the adventure could take off like this.

CHAOS: Then at the end of the adventure..

THE END!

How does it look?

Let's combine ours:

Adventure 1

Players: [[Wiki User D&D/Character Sheets/Kanjiro|P1]], P2

Order of turns: DM, P1, DM, P2

DM: Heian

Location: {Insert location here!}

Game (Take your turn)

DM: In game talk. {action}

Chatter (talk all you want)

How's this? Some stuff you don't need to include. --Kanjiro 18:52, 5 November 2007 (MST) DM's supposed to be able to answer questions and describe. I believe we shouldn't have him taking a turn at a time. But what about this?Chaosvii7 19:02, 5 November 2007 (MST)

Adventure 1

Players: [[Wiki User D&D/Character Sheets/Kanjiro|P1]], P2

Order of turns:DM's Player, P1,P2.

DM: Heian(Chaosvii7)

Location: {Insert location here!}

Game

DM: Describe, describe, describe.

DM'S PLAYER(If he uses one for the game): Confer things in group.

P1: bladda bladda bladda bladda blah!

P2: {Speaking actions}

{Actions like this}

Battle!

DM'S PLAYER: {Action}

P1: {action}

P2: {action}

FIGHTING THINGY(DM): {Fighting stuff}

After game

How's that? Chaosvii7 19:02, 5 November 2007 (MST)

The dm needs a turn in between every turn so he can 1. attack if he's a monster. 2. describe stuff 3. you can always skip your turn if you want. --Kanjiro 19:12, 5 November 2007 (MST)

But the DM should be able to describe stuff at any given time.Get it? Chaosvii7 19:14, 5 November 2007 (MST)

The reason we have turns is to avoid edit conflicts. --Kanjiro 19:19, 5 November 2007 (MST)

No, no no. I just think the DM doesn't need a turn in the cycle. Becaue only 1 person can do 1 movement or action per turn. And if they do make it into the room, but it isn't DM's turn, they would need to wait until it was.Chaosvii7 19:25, 5 November 2007 (MST)

That and, in a battle, I belive the cycle should have the DM doing 1 thing per turn. Chaosvii7 19:28, 5 November 2007 (MST)

Let's just keep the DM in the cycle, you can skip your turn if you want. --Kanjiro 19:29, 5 November 2007 (MST)

But I don't think it should be like:

DM: {skips turn}

Becuase that's not gonna make sense. But I do approve:

MONDTER(DM): {Action}

get it now? Chaosvii7 19:34, 5 November 2007 (MST)

It wouldn't go like that, you'd just say you skipped your turn in chatter. --Kanjiro 19:45, 5 November 2007 (MST)

Then how about we just don't say anything if we want to skip! Chaosvii7 20:09, 5 November 2007 (MST)

How would other people know that you skipped? --Kanjiro 20:25, 5 November 2007 (MST)

By the fact that you didn't say anything? Besides, we don't need a chatter thing. That's what the talk is for, isnt it? Chaosvii7 20:31, 5 November 2007 (MST)

Once again, EDIT CONFLICTS. --Kanjiro 20:48, 5 November 2007 (MST)

Yeah, but somebody could just hit back, copy and paste it, and put the thing they wanted to say in without having to re-type it. Chaosvii7 20:50, 5 November 2007 (MST)

But still... when you do that the game would change and you might have to redo what you say and then you'd get another edit conflict and so on... --Kanjiro 21:05, 5 November 2007 (MST)

Still, they're the same, since there'd be edit conflicts there, too. Chaosvii7 21:07, 5 November 2007 (MST)

Just... Keep chatter and you and me can speak whenever we want. Ok? One of our many perks. --Kanjiro 21:11, 5 November 2007 (MST)

I won't use chatter if we put it on, even as heian. Chaosvii7 19:02, 6 November 2007 (MST)

I still don't approve of chatter. Chaosvii7 14:51, 7 November 2007 (MST)

We need chatter. --Kanjiro 17:33, 7 November 2007 (MST)

We don't need chatter. Chaosvii7 17:41, 7 November 2007 (MST)

We are having Chatter. We can call it Chat if you like. --Kanjiro 18:04, 7 November 2007 (MST)

I still don't approve of chatter. Chaosvii7 18:10, 7 November 2007 (MST)