View source

By signatures, do you mean just the colorful ones with pictures or anything that links to your page? {{User:JCM/sig}} 12:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
:Why can't we have signitures if we want to be a mod?{{User:Ninjaduck/sig}} 15:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
::Pretty sure he means you can't use your signature while applying for mod and should sign your name like this when applyng for mod. [[User:The Noid|The Noid]]
:::Oh, OK. And, Super Sam, I think there's a more time effective way to do this. Just set up some rules to qualify for a mod. Here are some examples.
***You must have been active here for at least 6 months.
***You can't have ever trolled, flamed, or anything else that would've gotten you blocked.
***It will improve your chances if you helped out here and made a good quality fanstuff.
:::And if you don't get powers, whining about it will destroy any chances left. {{User:JCM/sig}} 22:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
:The second rule makes it impossible for anybody to be eligible, and the third is just borderline dumb. {{User:Chaosvii7/Sig}} 23:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
::Are you saying that everyone trolled here at least once? {{User:JCM/sig}} 12:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
:::No, it's probably the flamed part. {{User:TheStick/sig}} 12:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
::::Flaming counts as trolling, I think. {{User:JCM/sig}} 12:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
:::::No, I disagree. I always saw trolling as actively trying to disrupt the site. Flaming is singling a person out. However, flaming is so commonly used in trolling they're often confused. [[User:Ekul|Ekul]]<sup>[[User talk:Ekul|∞</sup>]] 04:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
::I have to say, not everybody flames on here. But still. Remember that more than not flaming, it's a good idea to have a good judge of motivation and class when moderating people. [[User:Ekul|Ekul]]<sup>[[User talk:Ekul|∞</sup>]] 14:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
:::"good quality fanstuff"

:::IRONY {{User:Skullbuggy/sig}} 14:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

:You know, personally I think only JCM and Chaos are qualified enough. {{User:Sephiroth/sig}} 21:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
::This may be because I know him so well, but I think Strong Sader would be an excellent mod if he applied. He's got good judgement, and he's very careful. He can take advice really seriously, and he analyzes his options before he acts too quickly. [[User:Ekul|Ekul]]<sup>[[User talk:Ekul|∞</sup>]]

thecheese supports nachoman and all of his stances
even though hes bi :) [[User:TheCheese|TheCheese]] 00:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

So, how do we do this? If someone isn't qualified for mod powers, you take them off they list without powers and if the are qualified, you take them off the list with powers? {{User:JCM/sig}} 01:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
:SURE THING - {{User:Super Sam/sig}} 01:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
::Uh, so is that a yes? {{User:JCM/sig}} 00:26, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
:::I'm not a mod, but I think we should ALL be able to upload by url. {{User:Chaosvii7/Sig}} 01:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm serious. Is that a yes? {{User:JCM/sig}} 22:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


I don't feel that fourth gens (Raiku/Lemon Demon43) should be made moderator despite activity on the Wiki User Wiki, and even if they had an account, they were inconspicuous to most of us on the HRFWiki. Chaos, having 8.3k contributions doesn't attribute to anything other than boasting. 

But this is my opinion, which again, no one cares about. {{User:Vindicator/sig}} 00:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:I'm third gen. I was Raggon in early 2007. {{User:Raiku/siggy}} 00:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
::And Lemon was Pie123. ...Wait, are 4th Gens those who joined after the purge? {{User:Im a bell/sig}} 00:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:::Supposedly, but I say the 4th gen joined after the purge was announced. {{User:Chaosvii7/Sig}} 00:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
::::I was in 2007 first, so I'm not a fourth gen. {{User:Raiku/siggy}} 00:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::I agree with vindi. {{User:Zoo977/sig}}
::::::Yes Raiku, but you didn't really make a name for yourself and more or less, you were inconspicuous to most, if not all people on the HRFWiki, earning your spot as a fourth gen. {{User:Vindicator/sig}} 00:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Gens depend on WHEN you were on the wiki. {{User:Raiku/siggy}} 00:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
::::::::No one has put you in the third gen as of yet, due to the lack of knowledge around you. Only you yourself have put yourself in the third gen. {{User:Vindicator/sig}} 00:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::''I'' put him in the third gen. {{User:Im a bell/sig}} 00:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::Why can we always seem to pin it on the crazy guy? {{User:Chaosvii7/Sig}} 00:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::::Going against what I said, it isn't the generation that matters, it's the activity that the user puts out. Now, in the time that I was active on the HRFWiki, I don't remember seeing a Raggon in there. I do remember seeing some of you other folk though. {{User:Vindicator/sig}} 00:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::::HURR DURR I'M A THIRD GEN SO GIVE ME MODERATOR {{User:Vindicator/sig}} 00:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::::::hey guys
:::::::::::::all of you are third gens
:::::::::::::quit fighting amongst yourselves [[User:TheCheese|TheCheese]] 00:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::::::True dat. By the way, I remember Raiku being Gavino, but never Raggon. {{User:JCM/sig}} 00:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::>vindicator
:::::::::::::::>third-gen
:::::::::::::::no thecheese just no {{User:Vindicator/sig}} 01:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
I was very noobish, and only on for a day or two until I forgot my password. {{User:Raiku/siggy}} 01:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:There are no such things as fourth gens they just don't want to be known as dirty thirdies - {{User:Super Sam/sig}} 01:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
::Filthy Fourthie sounds worse than Dirty Thirdie. {{User:Im a bell/sig}} 01:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:::True-dat {{User:girrbyte/sig}}

i never got blocked {{well}} {{User:Tahu/sig}}

== Raiku's Vote ==

I'm not being biased, and i'm not a sysop, but I can see who's wrong and right for the job. 

*Tahu/Lilfut - Isn't too active.
*Chaos - Has the potential, and is a sysop at an offical wiki.
*Lemon - Could make it, however he does revert even on not so vandalism, but I'm leaning towards him.
*Bell - Umm, lighten up. You could make it, but probaly not.
*Ninjaduck - Has been inactive lately.
*Zoo - Probaly good for the job, as he isn't sarcastic and would take the job seriously.
*StrongRad - Umm, yeah, Ewiki isn't popular, no one really likes it.
*The thing - I don't really see any vandalism reverting in your contribs, and you are inactive.
*Badstar - Has great edits, is a good vandal reverter, I would say yes.
*Kirbychu - You just came out of inactivity, and we don't really know your potenital.

{{User:Raiku/siggy}} 04:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
:Dude, how do you not know my potential? I ran a wiki and I've been a member for over a year, how does a month of inactivity due to a broken laptop suddenly make me not applicable?--{{User:Kirbychu HR'D/sig}} 04:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
::Hey, i said that my opinion does not affect it. This is what I think. Dude, you could be a good mod. {{User:Raiku/siggy}} 04:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
:::Make up your mind, do you not know my potential, or do you think I have good potential?--{{User:Kirbychu HR'D/sig}} 04:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
::::I don't really know you, but you COULD be a good mind, dammit {{User:Raiku/siggy}} 04:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::...You confuse me. Don't even bother trying to explain more 'cause I'll just get more confused.--{{User:Kirbychu HR'D/sig}} 04:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
*FACT: eveyone here has already had a wiki of his own at one point or another because he thought it was {{well}}, no exceptions
*FACT 2: getting confused only shows your lack of mod potential
DON'T COMPLAINS -{{User:20eric06/sig}} 16:31, 4 May 2009 (UTC)