a ver si se ve....

User talk:200.86.22.24

From Wiskipedia

(Difference between revisions)
(→zMeplrgfHmFs: new section)
(DAYWnNOYIa)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
Just wanted to say thakns for all of the work that's gone into this site.  I think it's a great idea.  You obviously love aviation, and have a genuine interest in helping others share the same passion.I haven't started flying yet, but once I gain the experience, I hope to contribute.Keep up the good work.  Thank you.
+
As Robert notes, you can do:svn merge -c-Xwhere X is the single reiosvin the change happened.  the -c is to specify a single reiosvin, and leading the reiosvin with a '-' indicates it should be reversed.Ash, that's just wrong!  The whole point of reiosvin control is that it should maintain a complete history of the changes to your code. The metadata associated with each change (the log message, for example) is invaluable in explaining *why* something was done, or why it was wrong. It's one of the major problems I have with most dvcs (git, darcs, etc) solutions; it becomes possible to lose reiosvins and revise history.
-
 
+
-
== zMeplrgfHmFs ==
+
-
 
+
-
I don't think so. It's hard to get good facial pionortrops when doing a self-portrait. If you hold the camera at a wonky angle, you look weird. . .but it's hard to hold the camera at a good angle when you are just holding the camera out and guessing. But I also did just did focus point focus with piknic, blurring everything not in focus. I suppose it does give it an underwater or dreamlike quality.
+

Current revision as of 10:13, 19 December 2012

As Robert notes, you can do:svn merge -c-Xwhere X is the single reiosvin the change happened. the -c is to specify a single reiosvin, and leading the reiosvin with a '-' indicates it should be reversed.Ash, that's just wrong! The whole point of reiosvin control is that it should maintain a complete history of the changes to your code. The metadata associated with each change (the log message, for example) is invaluable in explaining *why* something was done, or why it was wrong. It's one of the major problems I have with most dvcs (git, darcs, etc) solutions; it becomes possible to lose reiosvins and revise history.

Retrieved from "http://editthis.info/wiskipedia/User_talk:200.86.22.24"
Personal tools