Wikivinaya:Main Hall

From Wikivinaya

(Difference between revisions)
(Do we need a Wikisource section for original work)
Line 11: Line 11:
:This is a reply to the previous post, moved a bit more to the right than the previous post.[[User:Admin|DJti]] 21:09, 28 June 2006 (EDT)
:This is a reply to the previous post, moved a bit more to the right than the previous post.[[User:Admin|DJti]] 21:09, 28 June 2006 (EDT)
::Another reply, moved still more to the right. [[User:Admin|DJti]] 21:09, 28 June 2006 (EDT)
::Another reply, moved still more to the right. [[User:Admin|DJti]] 21:09, 28 June 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Wikisource==
 +
I'm wondering if there has been any consideration of setting up a clear area for large original source material?  For example the articles from eVinaya.  That way if authors wanted to include original work that would not be subject to editing they could.  Because, in general, my understanding is that pages wouldn't have authors as regular documents would.  Also, having source documents locked into part of wikiVinaya would prevent broken links in the future.  I'm not saying that all original work should be in a separate section, just longer articles, essays, etc.  [[User:BKh|BKh]] 17:19, 20 July 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:19, 20 July 2006

Main Hall  
Discussions can be held here in the Main Hall. After writing something here, put your signature down also by typing ~~~~. Please add new topics to the bottom of this page.

Please also take a look at the guidelines of discussion at WikiVinaya

Example

This is just an example of how the posts here should look like. There is the title of the topic ('Example' in this case), and under that you can start typing your comments. DJti 21:08, 28 June 2006 (EDT)

This is a reply to the previous post, moved a bit more to the right than the previous post.DJti 21:09, 28 June 2006 (EDT)
Another reply, moved still more to the right. DJti 21:09, 28 June 2006 (EDT)

Wikisource

I'm wondering if there has been any consideration of setting up a clear area for large original source material? For example the articles from eVinaya. That way if authors wanted to include original work that would not be subject to editing they could. Because, in general, my understanding is that pages wouldn't have authors as regular documents would. Also, having source documents locked into part of wikiVinaya would prevent broken links in the future. I'm not saying that all original work should be in a separate section, just longer articles, essays, etc. BKh 17:19, 20 July 2006 (EDT)

Personal tools