Wikireligion:Requests for adminship

From Wikireligion

Trying in a Rfa is the first step in becoming a sysop here at wikireligion. Rfa's last for about two weeks. To become a sysop you need 50% of the votes to be support and over 4 people need to vote. After passing, you get the tools and you are assigned a sysop to watch over you. If after a month he thinks you are doing good you will become a permanent sysop as long as you follow policies. If he does not think you are doing good enough you are assigned another sysop, this can happen up to three times. If the sysop does not think you are ready you are only a temporary admin, meaning you have the tools for three months. It will usualy take you one and a half months to become a sysop but may take up to two and a half. See here for your format for your request.

Put your name below the line to start an RfA.

---

Contents 1 RyGuy (talk • contribs) 2 Sir James Paul (talk • contribs) 3 P.B. Pilhet (talk • contribs) 4 ForestH2 (talk • contribs) 5 Luiza Smiche (talk • contribs)

RyGuy (talk • contribs)

• Note: Running for re-election to confirm adminship and bureucratship
• Tally: 1/0/0
• End Date: June 7, 2007, 03:13

• Support Helping run the wiki right now. Very good. ForestH2 18:54, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
• Support -- P.B. Pilhet 12:31, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

Sir James Paul (talk • contribs)

• Note: Running for re-election to confirm adminship
• Tally: 1/0/0
• End Date: Ends 22:53, 4 July 2007

• Support Helping run wiki right now. Very good. ForestH2 18:54, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
• Support Doing a great job so far. -- P.B. Pilhet 12:31, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

P.B. Pilhet (talk • contribs)

• Note: Running to confirm adminship
• Tally: 3/0/0
• End Date: 02:13, 20 June 2007

• Support - You've got my vote! -- RyGuy (talk • contribs) 09:07, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
• Support Of course I will support you. You are a great user.--Sir James Paul 20:01, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
• Support - Yes, yes, of course. ForestH2 18:54, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

ForestH2 (talk • contribs)

• Note: Running for re-election to confirm adminship and bureaucrat.
• Tally: 3/0/0
• Ending Date: 02:14, 20 June 2007

• Support - You haven't really done anything to harm the place. -- RyGuy (talk • contribs) 09:09, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
• Support - Again, like Ryan said :-) -- P.B. Pilhet 22:28, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
• Support He is a good user.--Sir James Paul 23:17, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

Luiza Smiche (talk • contribs)

• Note: Running for Sysop only
• Tally: 1/1/1
• End Date: 22:06, 2 July 2007

• Oppose Very good editor, very nice, and helpful, but she has not been here to long and even if she was we are not in need of any more admins.--Сэр Джеймс Пол, Слава, быть Богу. 18:08, 2 June 2007 (EDT)

• I know :(. But still, only the first oppose (Even if there isn't any support.) --Luiza Smiche 18:15, 2 June 2007 (EDT)

• I would suggest that you keep on editing wikireligion and run to become an admin when we have need for them. I am sure that someday you will become an admin because you have been a part of the project since the first year. Sorry about opposing you.--Сэр Джеймс Пол, Слава, быть Богу. 18:19, 2 June 2007 (EDT)

• Weak Support Not much experience using the "wiki" system it appears (by my Google search, her only other account is on Simple Wikipedia, and only since May 27th); also, it is like James said, we really don't need any new admins. However, despite these things, the only real question should be: will she abuse the tools? My answer to that question (based on her contribs so far, and her various comments) is maybe, but not intentionally. Therefore, she has my weak support. -- P.B. Pilhet 11:08, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

Abuse? No. I have my own wiki, I don't abuse my tools there. So here would be a definite. Thanks, anyways. --Luiza Smiche 11:22, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

• Netural We don't need admins right now, but still looks like a good user. Remember, try to make more content in articles right now. ForestH2 18:54, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

I feel like making an oxymoron. Of course if I created articles with content, there would be content to add, and if the only editor, and I add all the content, I am basically adding content that people might disagree with, removing hard work, so I leave up to you to mess around with, to add content. Am I clear :)?. --Luiza Smiche 19:43, 5 June 2007 (EDT)