Wikireligion talk:Requests for adminship
From Wikireligion
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:the whole setup is silly. a month to vote, then you get sysop powers, but have a buddy admin for a month. if that admin didn't like what you did, you get another one. and then another (up to three time). at that point, you either keep your admin powers or you are a "temporary admin" - whatever that means. meanwhile, you've been able to (ab)use sysop powers for 3 months while some buddy watches you. just dumb. [[User:Seven of nine|Seven of nine]] 16:27, 23 March 2007 (EST) | :the whole setup is silly. a month to vote, then you get sysop powers, but have a buddy admin for a month. if that admin didn't like what you did, you get another one. and then another (up to three time). at that point, you either keep your admin powers or you are a "temporary admin" - whatever that means. meanwhile, you've been able to (ab)use sysop powers for 3 months while some buddy watches you. just dumb. [[User:Seven of nine|Seven of nine]] 16:27, 23 March 2007 (EST) | ||
::Yeah, there are more than 4 users here but does anyone object to changing the amount of time to one week? Also, agreed with Seven of nine just make it straight forward? [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 16:28, 23 March 2007 (EST) | ::Yeah, there are more than 4 users here but does anyone object to changing the amount of time to one week? Also, agreed with Seven of nine just make it straight forward? [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 16:28, 23 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==RyGuy and Forest's RFA== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Do not get closed until a fourth vote comes along. Is my say. Any other opinons? [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 20:04, 16 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:04, 17 April 2007
Requested Change -- I request that the suggested 5 votes required be brought down to 4, at least for the time being. We don't have many members that will vote. Please, any opinions you have, I will listen to. -- RyGuy (talk • contribs) 08:18, 9 February 2007 (EST)
Support ForestH2 17:22, 9 February 2007 (EST)
To confusing
Requested change - the sysop elect thing is too confusing. I would think your on admin probation for a month and then if the community doesn't think your doing a good job, well, you are desysopped. Any opinons? ForestH2 18:07, 10 February 2007 (EST)
Support Seems reasonable -- RyGuy (talk • contribs) 15:14, 18 February 2007 (EST)
One month!
One month! Bit long isn't it? There's only about 4 users here. Does it really need that long to find out whether we want them or not? (Hint: no). Archer7 11:03, 23 March 2007 (EST)
- the whole setup is silly. a month to vote, then you get sysop powers, but have a buddy admin for a month. if that admin didn't like what you did, you get another one. and then another (up to three time). at that point, you either keep your admin powers or you are a "temporary admin" - whatever that means. meanwhile, you've been able to (ab)use sysop powers for 3 months while some buddy watches you. just dumb. Seven of nine 16:27, 23 March 2007 (EST)
- Yeah, there are more than 4 users here but does anyone object to changing the amount of time to one week? Also, agreed with Seven of nine just make it straight forward? ForestH2 16:28, 23 March 2007 (EST)
RyGuy and Forest's RFA
Do not get closed until a fourth vote comes along. Is my say. Any other opinons? ForestH2 20:04, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
