Wikireligion talk:Blocking policy
From Wikireligion
(Difference between revisions)
(where is policy?) |
(bad policy) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Where is policy? Seven of nine has been warned but he continues to be rude. Can we justify how this happend and can we block him for twenty four hours? [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 20:11, 9 March 2007 (EST) | Where is policy? Seven of nine has been warned but he continues to be rude. Can we justify how this happend and can we block him for twenty four hours? [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 20:11, 9 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==New Policy changes== | ||
| + | this new policy proposed by ForestH2 is absolutely unacceptable and untenable. Indefinitely blocking users without any warning for "rudeness"?? Rudeness is wholly subjective. And besides, shouldn't policies be ''proposed'' and not just ''dictated''? [[User:Seven of nine|Seven of nine]] 11:54, 15 March 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 16:54, 15 March 2007
Where is policy? Seven of nine has been warned but he continues to be rude. Can we justify how this happend and can we block him for twenty four hours? ForestH2 20:11, 9 March 2007 (EST)
New Policy changes
this new policy proposed by ForestH2 is absolutely unacceptable and untenable. Indefinitely blocking users without any warning for "rudeness"?? Rudeness is wholly subjective. And besides, shouldn't policies be proposed and not just dictated? Seven of nine 11:54, 15 March 2007 (EST)
