Wikireligion talk:Username Policy
From Wikireligion
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::(a) this can certainly be written more clearly; (b) you clearly have a beef with AntiChrist, and this new policy reeks of retaliatory action; ''and a new'' (c) How is "anit-religion" etc going to be defined? Some forms of athiesm are anti-religion, so are we going to block an athiest who comes here and selects a user name "I'm an Athiest" or "Athiest2007" etc? This policy seems arbitrary, imprecise, and possibly offensive to those who indeed ''are'' anti-religion. This is an encyclopedia, not an enclave only for those who are religious. [[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 10:29, 13 March 2007 (EST) | ::(a) this can certainly be written more clearly; (b) you clearly have a beef with AntiChrist, and this new policy reeks of retaliatory action; ''and a new'' (c) How is "anit-religion" etc going to be defined? Some forms of athiesm are anti-religion, so are we going to block an athiest who comes here and selects a user name "I'm an Athiest" or "Athiest2007" etc? This policy seems arbitrary, imprecise, and possibly offensive to those who indeed ''are'' anti-religion. This is an encyclopedia, not an enclave only for those who are religious. [[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 10:29, 13 March 2007 (EST) | ||
:::I've deleted this. Those we still need a username policy. Can anyone bring this up and start this policy in a better way? [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 17:26, 13 March 2007 (EST) | :::I've deleted this. Those we still need a username policy. Can anyone bring this up and start this policy in a better way? [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 17:26, 13 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Lets just have a policy that only does not allow names like fuck, ass, fag, dumbass, or anything like that. Maybe that is best. All that really matters is that we make this as a community. --[[User:Sir James Paul|Sir James Paul]] 21:34, 13 March 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 02:34, 14 March 2007
This policy is (a) incomplete (what does "with the block title, user..." mean??); (b) a personal reaction to some kind of feud between two editors. This should be discussed before implemented. Qwerty 08:48, 13 March 2007 (EST)
- I can answer A: When an admin goes to Special:Blockip they ask for a reason to block the user and it can be user...... I don't understand about B, a personal reaction to some kind of feud beteween two editors, please explain it more. ForestH2 09:59, 13 March 2007 (EST)
- (a) this can certainly be written more clearly; (b) you clearly have a beef with AntiChrist, and this new policy reeks of retaliatory action; and a new (c) How is "anit-religion" etc going to be defined? Some forms of athiesm are anti-religion, so are we going to block an athiest who comes here and selects a user name "I'm an Athiest" or "Athiest2007" etc? This policy seems arbitrary, imprecise, and possibly offensive to those who indeed are anti-religion. This is an encyclopedia, not an enclave only for those who are religious. Qwerty 10:29, 13 March 2007 (EST)
- I've deleted this. Those we still need a username policy. Can anyone bring this up and start this policy in a better way? ForestH2 17:26, 13 March 2007 (EST)
- Lets just have a policy that only does not allow names like fuck, ass, fag, dumbass, or anything like that. Maybe that is best. All that really matters is that we make this as a community. --Sir James Paul 21:34, 13 March 2007 (EST)
- (a) this can certainly be written more clearly; (b) you clearly have a beef with AntiChrist, and this new policy reeks of retaliatory action; and a new (c) How is "anit-religion" etc going to be defined? Some forms of athiesm are anti-religion, so are we going to block an athiest who comes here and selects a user name "I'm an Athiest" or "Athiest2007" etc? This policy seems arbitrary, imprecise, and possibly offensive to those who indeed are anti-religion. This is an encyclopedia, not an enclave only for those who are religious. Qwerty 10:29, 13 March 2007 (EST)
