Wikireligion:Requests for adminship

From Wikireligion

Revision as of 21:02, 18 February 2007

Sysop Elects

Trying in a Rfa is the first step in becoming a sysop here at wikireligion. Rfa's last for one month. To become a sysop you need 75% of the votes to be support and over 5 people need to vote. If you pass then you are a sysop elect but not a sysop yet. You are a sysop elect for 2 weeks before you are given the tools. After you get the tools you are assigned a sysop to watch over you. If after a month he thinks you are doing good you will become a permanent sysop as long as you act good. If he does not think you are doing good enough you are assigned another sysop, this can happen up to three times. If the sysop does not think you are ready you are only a temporary admin, meaning you have the tools for three months. It will usualy take you 1.2 months to become a sysop but may take up to 4.2 months. If we are in need of more sysops the waiting period can be taken away, and Rfa's made 2 weeks long. Every sysop will have to be renominated every 3 months just to make sure they are doing there job.

Put your name below the line.

RyGuy

RFA closes: 06:15, 5 March 2007 (EST)

A quick note as from Talk:Main Page, I think it would be best if RyGuy is made an admin early, but still has an RFA just in case the community doesn't think he is doing a good job. I am just waiting for two more people to support in accordance with the above policy. ForestH2 18:09, 10 February 2007 (EST)

I'm going to be creating pages and such, so I may need a few admin privlages to do some of the major pages, and to help out on the main page and such pages. I'm also runing for Bureaucrat. RyGuy 06:15, 5 February 2007 (EST)

• Support We need admins and I trust him. --Sir James Paul 06:26, 5 February 2007 (EST)
• Support seems ok. Qwerty 19:22, 8 February 2007 (EST)
• Support seems fine. I believe you are running for bureaucrat too. ForestH2 19:40, 8 February 2007 (EST)

Sir James Paul

RFA closes: 17:47, 5 March 2007 (EST)

Running for reelection to be an admin. Even if he loses his adminship, he will still have his bureaucrathsip unless otherwise specificed. Founder of wiki etc. ForestH2 17:47, 5 February 2007 (EST)

• Oppose, remove all tools Highly disapointed with recent edits. ForestH2 08:34, 7 February 2007 (EST)
• Oppose- Just because you are founder doesn't mean I have to vote for you, and don't block me because I said that. That would be another abuse of power.--RyGuy 05:30, 6 February 2007 (EST)
• Oppose Being a founder is irrelevant. Sir James hasn't demonstrated the discretion, patience, wisdom, or maturity necessary for sysop power. --Seven of nine 21:24, 6 February 2007 (EST)
  • Comment - see discusion at my talk page regarding Sir James' extreme abuse of admin power. He should be de-sysopped. --Seven of nine 06:54, 7 February 2007 (EST)
• Strong Oppose - abusive. Qwerty 19:22, 8 February 2007 (EST)
• Support He created this wiki and he is nice.--Abby Italia 09:51, 12 February 2007 (EST)
  • Comment Both points are irrelevant for sysop power. (meta-comment: this is Abby Italia's first and only edit) --Seven of nine 11:39, 12 February 2007 (EST)
• Support admin, remove bureaucrat. Yes, he's made far too many mistakes for us to count, but why not forget about it at this stage. I'm sure his intentions are good, and I think he can sort out his behaviour as an admin. When it comes to being a bureaucrat, that's a little different, I think that should be removed (maybe temporarily). Archer7 13:15, 12 February 2007 (EST)
• OPPOSE abusers of buttons ggo to ell! /// Messedrocka 16:00, 18 February 2007 (EST)

ForestH2

RFA closes: 17:47, 5 March 2007 (EST)

Running for reelection to be an admin. ForestH2 17:47, 5 February 2007 (EST)

• Support Since he is the co-founder. --Sir James Paul 17:52, 5 February 2007 (EST)
  • Comment him being a co-founder is irrelevant. A vandal can co-found a wiki (or a sockpuppetter, as the case may be). --Seven of nine 18:40, 5 February 2007 (EST)
• Pretty Good Support seeming a bit more reliable than before. RyGuy 05:10, 6 February 2007 (EST)
• Oppose he can be abusive too. Qwerty 19:22, 8 February 2007 (EST)
• Support. Yes, he's made mistakes but if you throw everyone out it's not much of a wiki. Right now, ForestH2 isn't doing a bad job. Archer7 08:51, 9 February 2007 (EST)
• Oppose absuive!! --Messedrocka 16:00, 18 February 2007 (EST)
• Strong oppose He hurts the eyes of God with his forest. ILOVERELIGION 16:02, 18 February 2007 (EST)

Matthew

RFA closes: 02:38, 7 March 2007 (EST)

I think i wud make a v good admin, i luv religion n stuff so i no plenty, plz make me a admin, plzzzz! --Matthew 02:38, 7 February 2007 (EST)

• Oppose - perhaps you should edit for a while first. --Seven of nine 06:55, 7 February 2007 (EST)
• Neutral-per Seven of Nine RyGuy 07:56, 7 February 2007 (EST)
• Oppose make at least one edit here. ForestH2 19:08, 7 February 2007 (EST)
• Oppose no edits Qwerty 19:22, 8 February 2007 (EST)
• Strong support Matthew has made a great contribution here and will only do good things that will please our Lord and Jesus. God bless us all. ILOVERELIGION 15:51, 18 February 2007 (EST)
• Support OK --Messedrocka 16:00, 18 February 2007 (EST)

ILOVERELIGION

I am a really nice person PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let me be an admin! I have a C grade in Religious studies and an E in computering. That means I'm really qualified. I'll be a good admin I promise. x ILOVERELIGION 15:56, 18 February 2007 (EST)

• Support myself, obviously. ILOVERELIGION 15:57, 18 February 2007 (EST)
• SUPPORT VERY MUCH /// GOD LOVES HIS CHILDRENZ! :-D /// Messedrocka 15:58, 18 February 2007 (EST)