Talk:Christmas
From Wikireligion
(Difference between revisions)
Abby Italia (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:That's a dumb idea. Christian holidays deserve their own articles (unless you want 100 different ones listed in the Christianity article). Similarly, Hannakuh should have its own article too. [[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 21:22, 17 February 2007 (EST) | :That's a dumb idea. Christian holidays deserve their own articles (unless you want 100 different ones listed in the Christianity article). Similarly, Hannakuh should have its own article too. [[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 21:22, 17 February 2007 (EST) | ||
::Agreed. I mean this ''is'' wiki''religion'' isn't it? You guys are making progress. --[[User:Abby Italia|Abby Italia]] 23:21, 17 February 2007 (EST) | ::Agreed. I mean this ''is'' wiki''religion'' isn't it? You guys are making progress. --[[User:Abby Italia|Abby Italia]] 23:21, 17 February 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | :::But these are probably the most notable ones. And besides, the Hannukah article, I think is shorter but this isn't much longer. [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 23:50, 17 February 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 04:50, 18 February 2007
Unless it becomes really long, it should be in the Christianity article like I did with Hannukah for Jew. ForestH2 08:10, 17 February 2007 (EST)
- That's a dumb idea. Christian holidays deserve their own articles (unless you want 100 different ones listed in the Christianity article). Similarly, Hannakuh should have its own article too. Qwerty 21:22, 17 February 2007 (EST)
- Agreed. I mean this is wikireligion isn't it? You guys are making progress. --Abby Italia 23:21, 17 February 2007 (EST)
- But these are probably the most notable ones. And besides, the Hannukah article, I think is shorter but this isn't much longer. ForestH2 23:50, 17 February 2007 (EST)
- Agreed. I mean this is wikireligion isn't it? You guys are making progress. --Abby Italia 23:21, 17 February 2007 (EST)
