User talk:ForestH2

From Wikireligion

Revision as of 22:51, 5 February 2007 (view source) Sir James Paul (Talk | contribs) (→Wikipedia user) ← Previous diff

Revision as of 01:41, 6 February 2007 (view source) ForestH2 (Talk | contribs) m (moved User talk:ForestH2 to User talk:Forest) Next diff →

---

Revision as of 01:41, 6 February 2007

Great!!! I'll keep my promise and promote you. Also do you know how to program a bot? I don't and I will need help in the future programing the JamesBot. It will be a anti-vandalism bot because we probably will have really bad vandalism problems here. Also do you think that this will have a chance at becoming a wikimedia projectsa in the future? Again welcome and happy editing. --Sir James Paul 14:49, 27 December 2006 (EST)

• You are now promoted. May I ask what is your religion? Also I want to start a Barnstar program here like at wikipedia, do you want to start one at wikikids also. Happy editing. --Sir James Paul 14:56, 27 December 2006 (EST)

Whatever your religion is please try not to put in your POV. About the bot, I want you to program it to be a anti-vandalism bot. This place will probably have a lot of vandalism and I think it will be important to have. The JamesBot is the bot I want programed. --Sir James Paul 19:39, 27 December 2006 (EST)

Contents 1 Your blocks 2 Email the password 3 Copyvio? 4 AMA 5 Wkikids 6 Chances of this place doing well 7 wikikidsen 8 Wikipedia user

Your blocks

the 3 IP's can not be sockpuppets because the three of them were editing at the same time and 1 person can not be at 3 locations at once. They probably have contact with eachother but we have no way to prove it so we can not block them. Also I left you a message at AMR. --Sir James Paul 13:11, 28 December 2006 (EST)

I don't blame you for thinking that. --Sir James Paul 17:37, 28 December 2006 (EST)

Users should not be blocked becuase they are "suspected sockpuppets" - sockpuppets of who? for what nefarious purpose? evidence? we don't put people in jail for be suspected criminals - proof and guilt needs to be established first. you need to show more restraint with blockign IPs if you want any of your projects to succeed.

• I'll leave the name up to you. Give me the password via email. My email is amherst3793@yahoo.com. Also I will make you a checkuser since you know more about IP's than me. Peace --Sir James Paul 15:02, 29 December 2006 (EST)

Email the password

amherst3793@yahoo.com

• Just eamil me the bots password, I am not a vandal so what is the big deal? Also it is both of our bots so I should also know the password. Peace. --Sir James Paul 15:50, 29 December 2006 (EST)
• Go to wikia and go on the IRC, you do not need a client for that. Tell me in private. I'll be there. --Sir James Paul 15:54, 29 December 2006 (EST)
• This[1] is it. --Sir James Paul 15:59, 29 December 2006 (EST)

You deleted some stuff in the CARM article that actualy was sourced.--Sir James Paul 12:50, 6 January 2007 (EST)

Copyvio?

how are those copyvios? Wikipedia releases them under the GFDL. Qwerty 18:41, 9 January 2007 (EST)

And here's an idea: articles on Islam, etc are important to have here, so maybe spend 30 seconds and edit it so as not to be a copy of the wikipedia version, rather than just deleting it. I don't see you (or anyone else for that matter) actually ADDING content here. Qwerty 19:08, 9 January 2007 (EST)

• Will you two stop it please. --Sir James Paul 16:54, 14 January 2007 (EST)

Make sure that it does not turn into anything big. If it becomes a fight you both will be blocked. --Sir James Paul 17:41, 14 January 2007 (EST)

Look at the main page talk page please. --Sir James Paul 07:27, 31 January 2007 (EST)

It is not the exact article at wikipedia and if it was it would not be a copvio because we are under the same license. --Sir James Paul 10:04, 3 February 2007 (EST)

Also reme,ber that wikikids and wikireligion have different policies and guidlines. Thanks. --Sir James Paul 10:14, 3 February 2007 (EST)

I will make a link and say who the author was. I will leave it on the talk page of the article. The List of Saints article is not the one from wikipedia. --Sir James Paul 12:24, 3 February 2007 (EST)

Look at the wikipedia one and this one. It is not.--Sir James Paul 12:27, 3 February 2007 (EST)

Now you are. Once we have 30 users you must try in a Rfa. --Sir James Paul 13:44, 3 February 2007 (EST)

Will you follow the policies here or will you follow your own? --Sir James Paul 13:47, 3 February 2007 (EST)

WR:Policies--Sir James Paul 13:50, 3 February 2007 (EST)

Great. It is a pain, but we are going to have to answer questions people ask. That includes you having sockpuppets at wikipedia. It makes people mad when there questions are not answered. That is what made 7 of nine leave wikikidsen. --Sir James Paul 13:55, 3 February 2007 (EST)

As the co-founder of this place I think you should be here everyday you can but it is up to you. --Sir James Paul 13:59, 3 February 2007 (EST)

AMA

For now it is inactive

Wkikids

its new so of course there will be problems. Change the policies with the community and i think we will be fine. --Sir James Paul 16:01, 3 February 2007 (EST)

Now that wikikids is not active will you spend more time here? --Sir James Paul 16:10, 3 February 2007 (EST)

I love how you selectively de-sysoped and blocked me and Sir James at wikikids, and not any other editor or admin. And for the record, that didn't fail becuase it was too strict, it failed becuase of lack of discipline. Have fun! --Seven of nine 20:34, 3 February 2007 (EST)

These editors still have sysop power: Green caterpillar (Bureaucrat, sysop), Rainbowsmiles (sysop), RyGuy (sysop), Tann (sysop). And you didn't block anyone else indefinitely, like you did me and Sir James. Why is that? (and since I can't edit there, this is the place for me to talk to you). --Seven of nine 21:14, 3 February 2007 (EST)

I am waiting from a reply from Green caterpillar about something important, so I am keeping him a sysop. Same with Rainbowsmiles. The others have been desysopped. Eventually, I will leave only Admin with the sysop/bureaucrat tools, so if I ever come back it will be easy to just ressysop myself. Admin, is the head account and the account that created editthis wiki's. What do you mean have fun? ForestH2 21:37, 3 February 2007 (EST)

Chances of this place doing well

What do you think the chances of this place doing well is? Also why do you think wikikidsen failed? I think it was because we were to tough. --Sir James Paul 16:29, 3 February 2007 (EST)

Now its doing fine. --Sir James Paul 16:46, 3 February 2007 (EST)

Are you a wiccan? If so it would be nice to have you right articles relating to wicca because I do not know enough about it. --Sir James Paul 20:58, 3 February 2007 (EST)

Tell them about this place. We need to get people from many different faiths here. --Sir James Paul 21:08, 3 February 2007 (EST)

wikikidsen

ForestH2, if you give me back my tools I will try to fix wikikidsen. I think it is a great idea and I would hate to see it fail. --Sir James Paul 05:14, 4 February 2007 (EST)

• Why did you Desysop Arjun? He only has temporary adminship and will have to go through a Rfa later. --Sir James Paul 13:50, 4 February 2007 (EST)
• Arjun is the last person who does not have to go through a Rfa right away. --Sir James Paul 13:52, 4 February 2007 (EST)

That is arbitrary and illogical. --Seven of nine 14:02, 4 February 2007 (EST)

• • He will have to go through a Rfa now but he gets to keep his tools while in the Rfa, he will not get the tools taken away unless he does not get 75% supporting votes. --Sir James Paul 13:54, 4 February 2007 (EST)

This also is arbitrary and illogical. --Seven of nine 14:02, 4 February 2007 (EST)

Actualy he was active here earlier today. --Sir James Paul 16:56, 4 February 2007 (EST)

We should when the wiki is more active. --Sir James Paul 16:59, 4 February 2007 (EST)

We will have to someday. --Sir James Paul 17:03, 4 February 2007 (EST)

If the current admins fail in there Rfa then the system will fail. That is why we should not run yet. --Sir James Paul 17:08, 4 February 2007 (EST)

Wikipedia user

Are you the same ForestH2 as the banned sockpuppeteer on wikipedia? RyGuy 06:12, 5 February 2007 (EST)

Yes, he is. --Seven of nine 06:48, 5 February 2007 (EST)

Hmm... I'll have to think about whether or not to support him (not trying to be rude, but I'm sure you know why I said that). RyGuy 06:59, 5 February 2007 (EST)

I think you missunderstood the reason for me blocking Seven of nine. It was to give him time to calm down. I agree thta it was stupid of me. --Sir James Paul 17:42, 5 February 2007 (EST)

Also the only thing that was a bit uncivil was blocking him --Sir James Paul 17:44, 5 February 2007 (EST)

I abused my power. --Sir James Paul 17:46, 5 February 2007 (EST)

Will you please change the vote on my Rfa? I am in control but I want this place to be built by the community. --Sir James Paul 17:51, 5 February 2007 (EST)